Over twenty years ago, in response to a medical culture characterized by paternalistic over-treatment, bio-ethicists and legal scholars promoted a model of end-of-life decision making based upon respect for patient autonomy. Empirical observations however, suggest that the Autonomy Model is only preferred by a segment of the population. Also, this model may not account fully for the complexity of end-of-life care, including cultural and ethnic differences in health care decision making and the important roles that family and religious communities play in supporting patients at the end of life. The purpose of this study is to use quantitative hypothesis testing and qualitative analysis to construct and test a model of end-of-life decision making with a focus on the decision control preferences of patients with terminal illnesses. This information will provide an in-depth understanding of the natural history of end-of- life decision making and can be used to enhance patient/family provider communication and provide health care consistent with patient/family values. We have modified the Decision Control Preference Scale of Degner and Sloan (1992) to measure the amount of control over end-of-life decisions that patients prefer to retain or place with the physician and/or family. Decision control preferences will be examined every three months for two years in 101 patients with terminal illnesses who have a prognosis of approximately two years of life. Patients will be followed from early in the diagnostic period until death. The illnesses selected are characterized by a steady progression towards death (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, (ALS) and Lung cancer) and an unpredictable course and sudden death (heart failure). This longitudinal, multimethod study is based on an eclectic conceptual approach, and The Patient Decision Making Framework, that includes the findings of Degner and others. All subjects will be evaluated with quantitative measures and a subset of five subjects in each disease group will also be interviewed with qualitative measures. Data will be analyzed to determine the influence of selected demographic, psychosocial, and health characteristics on decision control preferences and the decision control preferences of patients over time. Hypotheses: 1)Patients will exhibit a wide range of control preferences at diagnosis. 2)Control preferences will be significantly associated with demographic and psychosocial/physical health variables. We specifically hypothesize that non-white, non-US born, less educated, more religious patients, and patients with cancer will prefer less control in decision making. 3)There will be a change from more control to less control in patients' decision control preferences as they approach death

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01NR005224-01A1
Application #
6229512
Study Section
Nursing Research Study Section (NURS)
Program Officer
Varricchio, Claudette
Project Start
2001-02-01
Project End
2004-01-31
Budget Start
2001-02-01
Budget End
2002-01-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
$310,671
Indirect Cost
Name
Johns Hopkins University
Department
Type
Schools of Nursing
DUNS #
045911138
City
Baltimore
State
MD
Country
United States
Zip Code
21218
Xu, Jiayun; Nolan, Marie T; Heinze, Katherine et al. (2015) Symptom frequency, severity, and quality of life among persons with three disease trajectories: cancer, ALS, and CHF. Appl Nurs Res 28:311-5
Abshire, Martha; Xu, Jiayun; Dennison Himmelfarb, Cheryl et al. (2015) Symptoms and fear in heart failure patients approaching end of life: a mixed methods study. J Clin Nurs 24:3215-23
Nolan, Marie T; Hughes, Mark T; Kub, Joan et al. (2009) Development and validation of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Palliat Support Care 7:315-21
Nolan, Marie T; Kub, Joan; Hughes, Mark T et al. (2008) Family health care decision making and self-efficacy with patients with ALS at the end of life. Palliat Support Care 6:273-80
Astrow, A B; Sood, J R; Nolan, M T et al. (2008) Decision-making in patients with advanced cancer compared with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Ethics 34:664-8
Sulmasy, Daniel P; Hughes, Mark T; Thompson, Richard E et al. (2007) How would terminally ill patients have others make decisions for them in the event of decisional incapacity? A longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:1981-8
Nolan, Marie T; Hughes, Mark; Narendra, Derek Paul et al. (2005) When patients lack capacity: the roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions. J Pain Symptom Manage 30:342-53
Kub, Joan E; Nolan, Marie T; Hughes, Mark T et al. (2003) Religious importance and practices of patients with a life-threatening illness: implications for screening protocols. Appl Nurs Res 16:196-200