The well-being of children in same-sex families is debated in contemporary policy, law, and public realms. Yet, due to data and methodological limitations, we know relatively little about the mental and physical health of the approximately 220,000 children who live in same-sex families. Additionally, research on different-sex families shows that family resources are a central mechanism shaping child health, yet the role of family resources has gone unexamined in research on same-sex families. There is urgent need to resolve the question of the basic relationship between same-sex family structure, resources, and child health because the current state of in- conclusive research in this area may result in ineffective, misguided, or harmful public policy that reduce the effectiveness of initiatives aimed to promote optimal child health as well as undermine future scientific research in this area. The overall objective for this proposed project is to determine the population-level relationship between same-sex family structures, family resources, and child health. Our central hypotheses are that children residing in same-sex married and cohabiting families will experience worse health when compared to different- sex married families due to same-sex family's lower levels of family resources;children in same-sex families will experience similar health when compared to different-sex cohabiting and single-parent families due to similar access to family resources. The rationale that underlies the proposed research is that the development of consensus regarding the relationship between same-sex family structures, resources, and child health will direct future definitive research and public policy on the underlying contributors to optimal child health. The central hypothesis will be tested by analyzing pooled cross-sectional nationally representative data from the 1997- 2012 waves of the Integrated National Health Interview Surveys in pursuit of the following specific aims:
Aim 1. Examine differences in children's physical and mental health across same-sex married, same-sex cohabiting, different-sex married, different-sex cohabiting, and single-parent family structures.
Aim 2. Examine the role of family resources (i.e., socioeconomic, parent health and health behavior) in contributing to child health differences across family structure. Results are expected to be significant by filling a fundamental gap in our under- standing of the relationship between same-sex families and child health with reliable and valid nationally- representative population-based data. The proposed research is innovative because it takes a substantial departure from previous research by utilizing 1) national population-based data, 2) reliable and valid measures of same-sex married and cohabiting families, 3) comprehensive measures of family resources, and 4) multiple dimensions of child health. Results from this proposed study are expected to provide the focus for, and support the feasibility of, a subsequent mixed-methods longitudinal R01 proposal that will examine how demographic (e.g., race), relational (e.g., family transitions, length and quality), contextual (e.g., community resources),and selection characteristics determine child health in same-sex family structures.

Public Health Relevance

The proposed research is relevant to public health because it will advance the development of health policy by elucidating the specific family structures associated with optimal or disadvantaged child health, and by determining the extent to which family resources are an underlying mechanism of optimal or disadvantaged health among children in same-sex family structures. The proposed study is relevant to NICHD's mission because it aims to increase scientific understanding of, and improve policy and services for, child health by elucidating the fundamental social factors that affect optimal child health.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
Small Research Grants (R03)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (SSPA)
Program Officer
Bures, Regina M
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Ohio State University
Social Sciences
Schools of Arts and Sciences
United States
Zip Code
Liu, Hui; Waite, Linda J; Shen, Shannon et al. (2016) Is Sex Good for Your Health? A National Study on Partnered Sexuality and Cardiovascular Risk among Older Men and Women. J Health Soc Behav 57:276-96
Reczek, Corinne; Zhang, Zhe (2016) Parent-Child Relationships and Parent Psychological Distress: How Do Social Support, Strain, Dissatisfaction, and Equity Matter? Res Aging 38:742-66
Reczek, Corinne; Umberson, Debra (2016) Greedy Spouse, Needy Parent: The Marital Dynamics of Gay, Lesbian, and Heterosexual Intergenerational Caregivers. J Marriage Fam 78:957-974
Liu, Hui; Waite, Linda J; Shen, Shannon et al. (2016) Policy Brief. J Health Soc Behav 57:275
Reczek, Corinne; Pudrovska, Tetyana; Carr, Deborah et al. (2016) Marital Histories and Heavy Alcohol Use among Older Adults. J Health Soc Behav 57:77-96
Liu, Hui; Waite, Linda; Shen, Shannon (2016) Diabetes Risk and Disease Management in Later Life: A National Longitudinal Study of the Role of Marital Quality. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci :
Reczek, Corinne (2016) Ambivalence in Gay and Lesbian Family Relationships. J Marriage Fam 78:644-659
Reczek, Corinne; Spiker, Russell; Liu, Hui et al. (2016) Family Structure and Child Health: Does the Sex Composition of Parents Matter? Demography 53:1605-1630
Thomeer, Mieke Beth; Reczek, Corinne (2016) Happiness and Sexual Minority Status. Arch Sex Behav 45:1745-58
Liu, Hui; Umberson, Debra (2015) Gender, stress in childhood and adulthood, and trajectories of change in body mass. Soc Sci Med 139:61-9

Showing the most recent 10 out of 13 publications