Firearm injury is one of the leading causes of death in the United States.1 Governmental legislative response has focused on background checks for firearm purchasing, and mental health conditions account for an increasing percentage of disqualifications from firearm purchase. Available evidence indicates, however, that the absolute risk of violence by individuals who are mentally ill is low and is predicted by a prior history of substance use and criminality rather than mental illness. State variations in: (1) legal criteria fr involuntary commitment and other types of mental health adjudication; (2) mental health-related disqualifications from firearms; and (3) reporting firearm-disqualifying mental health records to the background check database also create ambiguities for clinicians and law makers tasked with shaping and evaluating disqualification. Information on an effective public health approach to background check disqualification is needed. We propose an agent-based model of firearm markets that would estimate the absolute number of deaths that would be prevented under various scenarios for firearm disqualification focusing on three main areas: a) mental illness; b) substance abuse; and c) criminality. We will implement disqualification scenarios recommended by the Consortium for Risk-Based Firearms Policy, in order to provide stakeholders with the optimal public health approach to using background check legislation to prevent firearm violence.

Public Health Relevance

Disqualifying high-risk individuals from purchasing a firearm at the point of sale is a critical component of a public health response to growing firearm-related injury in the United States. The optimal disqualification strategy, however, is not currently empirically based. We propose to use agent-based modeling to provide stakeholders with estimates of the public health benefit of various disqualification strategies based on history of mental illness, substance abuse, and criminality.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Exploratory/Developmental Grants (R21)
Project #
5R21DA041154-02
Application #
9265054
Study Section
Community Influences on Health Behavior Study Section (CIHB)
Program Officer
Schulden, Jeffrey D
Project Start
2016-05-01
Project End
2019-04-30
Budget Start
2017-05-01
Budget End
2019-04-30
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2017
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Columbia University (N.Y.)
Department
Public Health & Prev Medicine
Type
Schools of Public Health
DUNS #
621889815
City
New York
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10032
Cerdá, Magdalena; Tracy, Melissa; Keyes, Katherine M (2018) Reducing Urban Violence: A Contrast of Public Health and Criminal Justice Approaches. Epidemiology 29:142-150
Tracy, Melissa; Cerdá, Magdalena; Keyes, Katherine M (2018) Agent-Based Modeling in Public Health: Current Applications and Future Directions. Annu Rev Public Health 39:77-94
Keyes, Katherine M; Tracy, Melissa; Mooney, Stephen J et al. (2017) Invited Commentary: Agent-Based Models-Bias in the Face of Discovery. Am J Epidemiol 186:146-148
Cook, Philip J; Rivera-Aguirre, Ariadne E; Cerdá, Magdalena et al. (2017) Constant Lethality of Gunshot Injuries From Firearm Assault: United States, 2003-2012. Am J Public Health 107:1324-1328
Santaella-Tenorio, Julian; Cerdá, Magdalena; Villaveces, Andrés et al. (2016) What Do We Know About the Association Between Firearm Legislation and Firearm-Related Injuries? Epidemiol Rev 38:140-57
Wintemute, Garen J; Kass, Philip H; Stewart, Susan L et al. (2016) Alcohol, drug and other prior crimes and risk of arrest in handgun purchasers: protocol for a controlled observational study. Inj Prev 22:302-7
Cerdá, Magdalena (2016) Commentary: The Urban Environment and Violence: Moving Toward a Dynamic Understanding of Space. Epidemiology 27:29-31
Lambert, Kelly G; Nelson, Randy J; Jovanovic, Tanja et al. (2015) Brains in the city: Neurobiological effects of urbanization. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 58:107-22