Most of the current literature on racial and ethnic disparities in stroke comes from comparing whites with minorities. To identify key modifiable factors underlying these disparities, we propose an alternative approach that follows from recognizing that there is immense diversity in stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) incidence and outcomes within each racial and ethnic subpopulation. Factors underlying higher incidence or worse outcomes for blacks may be different than those for Hispanics. As a preliminary demonstration, we examined incidence of acute ischemic stroke using data of all inpatient admissions in New Jersey and Arizona (2002-2004). Non- Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics were each stratified into three income categories - lower, middle and higher;age-sex adjusted acute stroke incidence rates were obtained for each cohort. A remarkably puzzling - and to the best of our knowledge previously unreported, finding is that in both the states, the stroke rate for Hispanics was systematically higher for higher income groups. In contrast, the income gradients for blacks and whites were downward sloping. The usefulness of this approach is immediately apparent. In New Jersey and Arizona, the excess stroke rate (relative to same-income whites) for Hispanics is 25 percent for lower income cohort but 200 percent for higher income cohort. Therefore higher incidence risk among Hispanics may be less due to SES-related potential factors (limited insurance, low income, public assistance, physician supply) and more due to potential factors such as physiological risk factors (diabetes, obesity, hypertension), health behavior (smoking, exercise), risk awareness, geographic location and provider-related characteristics. Limiting analysis to each racial/ethnic subgroup, our objective is to identify and assess which potential factors influence """"""""excess"""""""" risk of stroke incidence and adverse hospital outcomes for the three racial and ethnic subpopulations. We propose to use data on all inpatient discharges during 2005-2007 from nine states (AZ, CA, FL, MA, NJ, NY, PA, SC and TX), with sizable minority populations. Incidence rates will be obtained by combining Census populations of each cohort. Hierarchical multivariate regression models negative binomial, logistic and linear, will be used to estimate the influence of each potential factor.
Reductions in stroke incidence and advancements in care for acute stroke have been instrumental in the steady declines in stroke mortality since the 1960s. One concern in recent years is that this decline has leveled. A second concern is that these gains have been disproportionately distributed across race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. For effective targeting of interventions and public policy, our study aims to use evidence to identify and prioritize modifiable factors appropriate for each minority cohort.
|Hanchate, Amresh D; Kapoor, Alok; Katz, Jeffrey N et al. (2015) Massachusetts health reform and disparities in joint replacement use: difference in differences study. BMJ 350:h440|
|Lasser, Karen E; Hanchate, Amresh D; McCormick, Danny et al. (2014) The effect of Massachusetts health reform on 30 day hospital readmissions: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics. BMJ 348:g2329|
|Hanchate, Amresh D; Schwamm, Lee H; Huang, Wei et al. (2013) Comparison of ischemic stroke outcomes and patient and hospital characteristics by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Stroke 44:469-76|
|Hanchate, Amresh D; Lasser, Karen E; Kapoor, Alok et al. (2012) Massachusetts reform and disparities in inpatient care utilization. Med Care 50:569-77|