The overall objective of the Center for the Study of Health Beliefs and Behavior is the development of models for improving communication among practitioners, patients, and families to improve the quality of patient's experience in the health care setting and to improve health outcomes. To accomplish this objective, the center and the three accompanying proposals, an """"""""Expert System for inferring patient illness and treatment models"""""""", """"""""Self-regulation and self-management in older asthmatics,"""""""" and """"""""Disease models, psychosocial factors and end-of-life planning"""""""", have the following specific aims: 1. To deepen our understanding of cognitive and affective processes underlying older individuals' understanding and emotional reactions to their experiences with chronic illness, and the effects of their experience on function, treatment decisions, self care, social relationships and end of life decisions. The commonsense model of self regulation (CS/SR) will be used as the framework for integrating the individual, social, institutional and cultural level processes that reflect the inter-disciplinary make up of the center faculty. 2. To translate the findings of research based on cognitive/affective science into the clinical context by developing interventions that consider all participants in the management of chronic illness: practitioners, patients, and family members. We view this as a bidirectional process, the concepts for understanding cognitive-affective processes affecting practice, and practice raising questions and suggesting concepts for inclusion in the models of patient behavior. 3. Develop, test and disseminate theory based interventions to increase the overlap of common-sense models of illness and treatments (CS/SR) held by patients and family members with each other's representations and with valid biopsychosocial models of illness and treatment. A variety of methodologies are used by each study to achieve these aims including detailed observation of provider practices, cohort designs predicting patient behaviors and health outcomes, qualitative methods, and randomized trials assessing mediating processes and testing the efficacy of specific intervention strategies. The faculty and consultants, internationally recognized experts in cognitive affective models of health behavior, health policy, basic cognitive processes, cognitive-behavioral interventions, medical sociology and geriatric medicine, are organized into four units to assist junior faculty in the development of theoretically rich and methodologically rigorous studies designed to meet our specific aims: an Administrative Core; Design and Analysis Core (e.g., qualitative methods and intervention design); Data and Instrument Sharing (development of common measures); Development of Research Agenda (defining new directions, e.g., biological processes and cost effectiveness, and assisting in grant preparation), and Faculty Development. Our ultimate vision is that the development, testing and dissemination of models to improve the bi-directional flow of information among practitioners, patients and involved family, will increase shared decision making and insure the implementation of practice guidelines by all participants. The outcome will be the ongoing re-shaping of health care policies to facilitate effective, communication practices among practitioners, patients and families. ? ?

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Resource-Related Research Projects (R24)
Project #
5R24AG023958-02
Application #
6947812
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-RPHB-B (50))
Program Officer
Nielsen, Lisbeth
Project Start
2004-09-15
Project End
2009-08-31
Budget Start
2005-09-01
Budget End
2006-08-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2005
Total Cost
$894,089
Indirect Cost
Name
Rutgers University
Department
Type
Organized Research Units
DUNS #
001912864
City
New Brunswick
State
NJ
Country
United States
Zip Code
08901
Garrido, Melissa M; Idler, Ellen L; Leventhal, Howard et al. (2013) Pathways from religion to advance care planning: beliefs about control over length of life and end-of-life values. Gerontologist 53:801-16
Boerner, Kathrin; Carr, Deborah; Moorman, Sara (2013) Family relationships and advance care planning: do supportive and critical relations encourage or hinder planning? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 68:246-56
Mora, Pablo A; Beamon, Teerah; Preuitt, LeAnn et al. (2012) Heterogeneity in depression symptoms and health status among older adults. J Aging Health 24:879-96
Carr, Deborah (2012) ""I don't want to die like that ..."": the impact of significant others' death quality on advance care planning. Gerontologist 52:770-81
Phillips, L Alison; Leventhal, Elaine A; Leventhal, Howard (2011) Factors associated with the accuracy of physicians' predictions of patient adherence. Patient Educ Couns 85:461-7
Mora, Pablo A; Berkowitz, Alayna; Contrada, Richard J et al. (2011) Factor structure and longitudinal invariance of the Medical Adherence Report Scale-Asthma. Psychol Health 26:713-27
Carr, Deborah (2011) Racial differences in end-of-life planning: why don't Blacks and Latinos prepare for the inevitable?. Omega (Westport) 63:1-20
Patil, Sangita P; Wisnivesky, Juan P; Busse, Paula J et al. (2011) Detection of immunological biomarkers correlated with asthma control and quality of life measurements in sera from chronic asthmatic patients. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 106:205-13
Keating, Catherine L; Dixon, John B; Moodie, Marjory L et al. (2009) Cost-efficacy of surgically induced weight loss for the management of type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 32:580-4
Idler, Ellen L; McLaughlin, Julie; Kasl, Stanislav (2009) Religion and the quality of life in the last year of life. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 64:528-37

Showing the most recent 10 out of 19 publications