Breast cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality among women in the US. New discoveries have resulted in the widely accepted view that breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with molecularly distinguishable morphological subtypes. This awareness is driving the development of new paradigms for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of breast cancer. However, there are very limited data on the population effects of these novel cancer control approaches. Population modeling is a unique comparative effectiveness paradigm to fill this gap by translating advances from the laboratory and clinical trials to understanding their net effects on US breast cancer mortality. The CISNET Breast Working Group has collaborated over the past nine years to apply independent population models to evaluate cancer control practices and use results to inform clinical and public health guidelines. This proposal leverages the investment in these models and provides the continuity and cohesion of this highly productive group. The modeling groups include Dana Farber (D). Erasmus MC (E), Georgetown-Einstein (G), MD Anderson (M), Stanford (S) and Wisconsin-Harvard (W). For this application, we will extend our work by modeling populations of women with varying risk factors (e.g., breast density, HRT) for the development of specific molecular subtypes of breast cancer (based on ER and HER2).
Our specific aims are to use these adapted models to: 1) compare the impact of observed practice patterns to the benefits and harms of targeting new screening and adjuvant therapy modalities based on risk factors and molecular subtypes;2) explore the impact of improving access to new services;3) conduct value-of information-like analyses to evaluate the relationship between performance characteristics of a new screening test (e.g. blood based biomarker) and its impact on breast cancer mortality, utilization of treatments and over-diagnosis;and 4) communicate results to end-users using a web-based platform. This work will advance the field of modeling by explicitly capturing molecular attributes of breast cancer, and in so doing, build a robust capacity to inform debates about "best practices" for cancer control interventions.
Breast cancer is the 2 leading cause of cancer death in US women. New discoveries are re-defining best practices to reduce mortality. However, few of these novel strategies have been fully tested for effectiveness in reducing overall breast cancer deaths in the general population. Moreover, many women remain without access to even current standard cancer-related services. We will use population modeling to fill gaps in knowledge by translating research results from trials to their net effects on US breast cancer mortality rates.
|Sprague, Brian L; Stout, Natasha K; Schechter, Clyde et al. (2015) Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Ann Intern Med 162:157-66|
|Chang, Yaojen; Gallon, Lorenzo; Shetty, Kirti et al. (2015) Simulation modeling of the impact of proposed new simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation policies. Transplantation 99:424-30|
|Sprague, Brian L; Gangnon, Ronald E; Burt, Veronica et al. (2014) Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:|
|Berry, Donald A (2014) Failure of researchers, reviewers, editors, and the media to understand flaws in cancer screening studies: application to an article in Cancer. Cancer 120:2784-91|
|Choi, Sangbum; Huang, Xuelin; Chen, Yi-Hau (2014) A class of semiparametric transformation models for survival data with a cured proportion. Lifetime Data Anal 20:369-86|
|Kinney, Anita Y; Butler, Karin M; Schwartz, Marc D et al. (2014) Expanding access to BRCA1/2 genetic counseling with telephone delivery: a cluster randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:|
|Chang, Yaojen; Gallon, Lorenzo; Jay, Colleen et al. (2014) Comparative effectiveness of liver transplant strategies for end-stage liver disease patients on renal replacement therapy. Liver Transpl 20:1034-44|
|Stout, Natasha K; Lee, Sandra J; Schechter, Clyde B et al. (2014) Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju092|
|Weedon-Fekjær, Harald; Romundstad, Pål R; Vatten, Lars J (2014) Modern mammography screening and breast cancer mortality: population study. BMJ 348:g3701|
|Schwartz, Marc D; Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis B; Peshkin, Beth N et al. (2014) Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:618-26|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 30 publications