Since the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2001, there have been great expectations for translating human genomic information directly into clinically practice. During the last several years, numerous large studies have cataloged human DNA variation. In parallel, advances in DNA sequencing technologies have increased the throughput and decreased costs. We are now positioned to broadly deploy our knowledge of human genetic variation, coupled with high-throughput DNA sequencing methods, for individualized, large-scale """"""""medical resequencing"""""""" to comprehensively reveal the genetic mechanisms underlying disease and influence clinical treatment. This """"""""base pairs to bedside"""""""" translation requires multidisciplinary study. The University of Washington is a leader in clinical genetics (Bennett, Burke, Byers, Hisama, and Jarvik, Motulsky, Raskind, and Sybert), bioethics (Burke, Jarvik, Fullerton, and Trinidad), second-generation sequencing, variant calling and annotation (Rieder and Nickerson), disease gene discovery (Browning, Heagerty, Jarvik, Nickerson, and Rieder), medical informatics (Tarczy-Hornoch), and health services research (Heagerty, Patrick, Regier, and Veenstra). In this highly integrated proposal, we combine these strengths to investigate aspects of using exomic data clinically. We propose a randomized controlled trial of usual care vs. the addition of exome analysis in University of Washington Medical Genetics Clinic patients who have clinical indications for colorectal cancer/polyposis (CRCP) genetic testing. We will evaluate the effectiveness of this technology for the identification of clinically relevant CRCP gene mutations, cost, and patient derived measures. After deliberations by experts to identify variants that are incidental findings that should be returned, we will also return CLIA certified results to the participants. We will obtain structured feedback from subjects in both the usual care and exome arms of the RCT to evaluate their experiences. We will further consider the input of referring physicians and patients using focus groups. We will investigate the legal basis of the need to return CLIA certified research results. An important component of our work is determination of not only which results to return, but how best to incorporate these genomic data into the medical record. Finally, we will perform CRCP gene discovery studies for families without identifiable CRCP mutations;such novel gene discovery can impact prevention and treatment.
The use of exome data in clinical medicine is a transformative technology. It offers the possibility of faster, less expensive and more complete resolution of genetic diagnoses as well as personalized prevention and treatment. Here we apply a multidisciplinary team to evaluate clinical genomics applied to colorectal cancer.
|Amendola, Laura M; Robinson, Jill O; Hart, Ragan et al. (2018) Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium. J Genet Couns 27:1220-1227|
|Rosenthal, Elisabeth A; Shirts, Brian H; Amendola, Laura M et al. (2018) Rare loss of function variants in candidate genes and risk of colorectal cancer. Hum Genet 137:795-806|
|Porter, Kathryn M; Kauffman, Tia L; Koenig, Barbara A et al. (2018) Approaches to carrier testing and results disclosure in translational genomics research: The clinical sequencing exploratory research consortium experience. Mol Genet Genomic Med 6:898-909|
|Evans, Barbara J; Jarvik, Gail P (2018) Impact of HIPAA's minimum necessary standard on genomic data sharing. Genet Med 20:531-535|
|Wolf, Susan M; Amendola, Laura M; Berg, Jonathan S et al. (2018) Navigating the research-clinical interface in genomic medicine: analysis from the CSER Consortium. Genet Med 20:545-553|
|Weymann, Deirdre; Veenstra, David L; Jarvik, Gail P et al. (2018) Patient preferences for massively parallel sequencing genetic testing of colorectal cancer risk: a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Hum Genet 26:1257-1265|
|Hart, M Ragan; Biesecker, Barbara B; Blout, Carrie L et al. (2018) Secondary findings from clinical genomic sequencing: prevalence, patient perspectives, family history assessment, and health-care costs from a multisite study. Genet Med :|
|Punj, Sumit; Akkari, Yassmine; Huang, Jennifer et al. (2018) Preconception Carrier Screening by Genome Sequencing: Results from the Clinical Laboratory. Am J Hum Genet 102:1078-1089|
|Sanghvi, Rashesh V; Buhay, Christian J; Powell, Bradford C et al. (2018) Characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome and genome sequencing data across 10 centers. Genet Med 20:855-866|
|Christensen, Kurt D; Bernhardt, Barbara A; Jarvik, Gail P et al. (2018) Anticipated responses of early adopter genetic specialists and nongenetic specialists to unsolicited genomic secondary findings. Genet Med 20:1186-1195|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 77 publications