The clinical practice of acute ischemic stroke is at a critical juncture. The use of dot-removal devices approved by the FDA is rapidly expanding, and more devices are poised to enter clinical practice in next several years. This major change in clinical practice has accelerated since 2004 after the approval of the first FDA-cleared device for thrombus removal in acute stroke patients and is occurring without clinical data demonstrating that these devices improve patient outcome as compared to standard therapy (IV rt-PA within three hours of onset). The ongoing multicenter Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Trial is the only randomized Phase III trial that compares the standard therapy to an approach that combines IV rt-PA followed by lA removal of thrombus by devices and/or lA rt-PA. Data from this Trial are critical to inform clinical and public health policy decisions regarding the roe of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. The primary objective of the IMS III Trial is to determine if ischemic stroke subjects with a baseline NIHSS scores 10, or with an NIHSSSof 8-9 with evidence of MCA, ICA, or basilar artery occlusion by CTA, treated with the combined IV+IA approach started within 3 hours of onset, are more likely to have a favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 assessed at 90 days from randomization, as compared to subjects treated with standard IV rt-PA. The two treatment groups also are compared with regard to additional clinical outcome measures, imaging, and safety data. In addiiton, cost effectiveness of the combined IV+IA approach is evaluated. The Trial currently is supported by two NINDS cooperative agreement grants: (1) to the University of Cincinnati Clinical Coordinating and Angiographic Imaging Center (PI: Joseph P. Broderick, MD) to provide clinical leadership and project and site management;and (2) to the Statistical and Data Coordinating Center (SDCC) at the Medical University of South Carolina (PI: Yuko Y. Palesch, PhD) to provide data management and statistical expertise. The purpose of this competitive renewal application from the SDCC is to closely collaborate with the Trial investigators to bring the IMS III Trial to successful completion with data quality of the highest standard.
Recently, the FDA has approved increasing number of devices to remove the clot in acute ischemic stroke patients, but no study to date has demonstrated that these devices improve patient outcomes. The purpose of the IMS III Trial is to definitively determine whether or not the use of these devices, in addition to the current standard treatment with intravenous rt-PA, results in better patient outcome (assessed at 90 days) compared to current standard treatment with intravenous rt-PA alone.
|Al-Ali, Firas; Elias, John J; Tomsick, Thomas A et al. (2015) Relative Influence of Capillary Index Score, Revascularization, and Time on Stroke Outcomes From the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial. Stroke 46:1590-4|
|Palesch, Yuko Y; Yeatts, Sharon D; Tomsick, Thomas A et al. (2015) Twelve-Month Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial. Stroke 46:1321-7|
|Abou-Chebl, Alex; Yeatts, Sharon D; Yan, Bernard et al. (2015) Impact of General Anesthesia on Safety and Outcomes in the Endovascular Arm of Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Trial. Stroke 46:2142-8|
|Tomsick, T A; Foster, L D; Liebeskind, D S et al. (2015) Outcome Differences between Intra-Arterial Iso- and Low-Osmolality Iodinated Radiographic Contrast Media in the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:2074-81|
|Khatri, Pooja; Hacke, Werner; Fiehler, Jens et al. (2015) State of acute endovascular therapy: report from the 12th thrombolysis, thrombectomy, and acute stroke therapy conference. Stroke 46:1727-34|
|Adeoye, Opeolu; Sucharew, Heidi; Khoury, Jane et al. (2015) Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator plus eptifibatide versus recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator alone in acute ischemic stroke: propensity score-matched post hoc analysis. Stroke 46:461-4|
|Yeatts, Sharon D; Martin, RenÃ©e H (2015) What is missing from my missing data plan? Stroke 46:e130-2|
|Broderick, Joseph P; Berkhemer, Olvert A; Palesch, Yuko Y et al. (2015) Endovascular Therapy Is Effective and Safe for Patients With Severe Ischemic Stroke: Pooled Analysis of Interventional Management of Stroke III and Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands Stroke 46:3416-22|
|Menon, Bijoy K; Qazi, Emmad; Nambiar, Vivek et al. (2015) Differential Effect of Baseline Computed Tomographic Angiography Collaterals on Clinical Outcome in Patients Enrolled in the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial. Stroke 46:1239-44|
|Simpson, Kit N; Simpson, Annie N; Mauldin, Patrick D et al. (2014) Drivers of costs associated with reperfusion therapy in acute stroke: the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial. Stroke 45:1791-8|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 17 publications