Core D is critical for the central tenet ofthe UCLA-CMCR, which is that classes of mitigators of radiation damage can be identified by their chemical structures and/or the biological pathways that they utilize. Core D has provided and will continue to provide the technological driving force behind the work ofthe projects in high-throughput screening (HTS) of small molecule libraries with the aim of discovering novel mitigators of radiation damage. Core D centralizes HTS in a state-of-the-art facility that has already proven its value to the UCLA-CMCR, with several families of lead compounds identified. Additionally, in order to deal with the data that has been generated and to provide it to the CMCR in a form in which it can be mined for structure activity relationships and other relevant chemical and biological information Core D, through pilot research funding, has established a relationship with Collaborative Drug Discovery (CDD) to use its an industrial strength database for these purposes. Access to this data is available to other CMCRs. Now that families of lead compounds have been identified, with more to come. Core D has been further expanded to include pharmaceutical chemists under Dr. Jung, who will play a central role in design and synthesis of analogues of active compounds to identify chemical structures responsible for activity, to improve their drug-like qualities, and their efficacy. This relationship also was initiated through pilot research funding. Finally, Core D provides proteomics primarily in the form of mass spectrometry to seek molecular signatures of the biological pathways utilized by effective mitigators so as to probe mechanism of action of these compounds.
Core D brings technology that allows us to measure the effects of many thousands of compounds on the response of cells to radiation so as to discover novel agents;an industrial-strength database to house the data and explore it to derive information;the ability to chemically improve active compounds and investigate structure-activity relationships;and to define the pathways by which they bring about their effects.
|Graham, Nicholas A; Minasyan, Aspram; Lomova, Anastasia et al. (2017) Recurrent patterns of DNA copy number alterations in tumors reflect metabolic selection pressures. Mol Syst Biol 13:914|
|Sasine, Joshua P; Yeo, Kelly T; Chute, John P (2017) Concise Review: Paracrine Functions of Vascular Niche Cells in Regulating Hematopoietic Stem Cell Fate. Stem Cells Transl Med 6:482-489|
|Duhachek-Muggy, Sara; Bhat, Kruttika; Vlashi, Erina et al. (2017) Growth Differentiation Factor 11 does not Mitigate the Lethal Effects of Total-Abdominal Irradiation. Radiat Res 188:469-475|
|Purbey, Prabhat K; Scumpia, Philip O; Kim, Peter J et al. (2017) Defined Sensing Mechanisms and Signaling Pathways Contribute to the Global Inflammatory Gene Expression Output Elicited by Ionizing Radiation. Immunity 47:421-434.e3|
|Micewicz, Ewa D; Kim, Kwanghee; Iwamoto, Keisuke S et al. (2017) 4-(Nitrophenylsulfonyl)piperazines mitigate radiation damage to multiple tissues. PLoS One 12:e0181577|
|Himburg, Heather A; Doan, Phuong L; Quarmyne, Mamle et al. (2017) Dickkopf-1 promotes hematopoietic regeneration via direct and niche-mediated mechanisms. Nat Med 23:91-99|
|Wang, Wenyuan; Org, Tonis; Montel-Hagen, Amélie et al. (2016) MEF2C protects bone marrow B-lymphoid progenitors during stress haematopoiesis. Nat Commun 7:12376|
|Sun, Yujie; Kaur, Kawaljit; Kanayama, Keiichi et al. (2016) Plasticity of Myeloid Cells during Oral Barrier Wound Healing and the Development of Bisphosphonate-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw. J Biol Chem 291:20602-16|
|Himburg, Heather A; Sasine, Joshua; Yan, Xiao et al. (2016) A Molecular Profile of the Endothelial Cell Response to Ionizing Radiation. Radiat Res 186:141-52|
|Yan, Xiao; Himburg, Heather A; Pohl, Katherine et al. (2016) Deletion of the Imprinted Gene Grb10 Promotes Hematopoietic Stem Cell Self-Renewal and Regeneration. Cell Rep 17:1584-1594|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 90 publications