The overall aim of this SOBC Resource and Coordinating Center (RCC) application is to provide strategic leadership, efficient coordination, inspired support, and pioneering dissemination of the innovative experimental medicine approaches that SOBC consortium scientists will adopt to identify, validate assays, and engage novel behavior change targets. As the SOBC RCC, we will capitalize on advances in Information and Team Science to help the Consortium accomplish its mission to identify and translate promising behavior change targets into public health impact. Specifically, to foster systematization of shareable knowledge on behavior change targets within the Consortium, we will use cutting-edge Information Science principles and a web-based Rapid- Learning Collaboration Platform to establish, curate, and maintain a SOBC registry of validated assays, interventions, best practices, and technical guidelines. This will lead to our creation of an electronic registry with searchable wizard and electronic collaboration capabilities. To enhance coordination and communication activities between SOBC scientists, we will leverage empirical Team Science findings and online science community approaches. Innovative aspects of our approach will include the use of the web-based Rapid- learning Collaboration Platform, a minimum viable innovation-system (an organized approach to creating a reliable, strategically focused innovation function with minimal resources and time that has traditionally been used in business settings), and crowdsourcing for identification of basic behavioral science gaps in our three domains. Further, we will draw upon our substantial expertise in statistical, psychometric, and comprehensive systematic reviews to support the needs of SOBC consortium members. This will include conducting multiple systematic reviews in the area of behavior change and providing essential training and consultations to the Consortium in these areas. Our RCC team also has unique expertise in the measurement and validation of adherence to medical regimens, and of other health behaviors. As well, we have gathered world-renowned scientists in the target assay domains areas of self-regulation, stress reactivity and stress resiliency, and interpersonal and social processes. These experts in the domains, quantitative approaches, and health behaviors will support the UH2/UH3 scientists through our Collaboration Platform and through individual consultations. Some additional innovative aspects of our approach include incentivized replication studies of finalized assays, validation of assays into Spanish, and multi-method dissemination efforts (e.g., TED talks). An emerging high- priority need for basic behavioral science is to find more effective ways to conduct behavior change experimental science, and then to systematize and disseminate these findings so that the knowledge base for behavior change science can advance programmatically, rather than haphazardly. Our SOBC RCC has the experience and expertise needed to work with NIH leadership and the UH2/UH3 scientists to support the SOBC consortium as it fulfills its promise in identifying putative, modifiable targets for behavior change.

Public Health Relevance

The Science of Behavior Change (SOBC) consortium is a unique opportunity to change the course of how basic behavior change interventions are developed. This SOBC Resource and Coordinating Center (RCC) will incorporate several exciting innovative interdisciplinary science trends into our RCC approach to maximize the creativity, productivity, scientific rigor, and dissemination of the efforts of the SOBC consortium to meaningfully impact health behaviors. Our SOBC RCC has the experience and expertise needed to work with NIH leadership to support the SOBC consortium as it makes great advances in basic behavioral science.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Resource-Related Research Projects--Cooperative Agreements (U24)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1)
Program Officer
Nielsen, Lisbeth
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Columbia University (N.Y.)
Internal Medicine/Medicine
Schools of Medicine
New York
United States
Zip Code
Swaminath, A; Feathers, A; Ananthakrishnan, A N et al. (2017) Systematic review with meta-analysis: enteral nutrition therapy for the induction of remission in paediatric Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 46:645-656
Edmondson, Donald; Falzon, Louise; Sundquist, Kevin J et al. (2017) A systematic review of the inclusion of mechanisms of action in NIH-funded intervention trials to improve medication adherence. Behav Res Ther :
Davidson, Karina W; Cheung, Ying Kuen (2017) Envisioning a future for precision health psychology: innovative applied statistical approaches to N-of-1 studies. Health Psychol Rev 11:292-294
Gutierrez, Jose; Albuquerque, Ana Letícia A; Falzon, Louise (2017) HIV infection as vascular risk: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. PLoS One 12:e0176686
Davidson, Karina W (2017) Waiting for Godot: Engaging in Discussions About Depression Care in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction While Waiting for a Definitive Trial That Never Appears. Circulation 135:1690-1692
Edmondson, Donald; von Känel, Roland (2017) Post-traumatic stress disorder and cardiovascular disease. Lancet Psychiatry 4:320-329
Wasson, Lauren T; Cusmano, Amberle; Meli, Laura et al. (2016) Association Between Learning Environment Interventions and Medical Student Well-being: A Systematic Review. JAMA 316:2237-2252