Advanced Technology QA Center Our plan is to capitalize on the infrastructure and strengths of the nation's existing quality assurance (QA) programs that comprise our Advanced Technology QA Consortium (ATC), including the Image-Guided Therapy Center (ITC), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), Radiological Physics Center (RPC), and the Quality Assurance Review Center (QARC) to maintain/develop an advanced medical informatics infrastructure that provides an environment in which institutions can submit, and QA Centers can receive, share, and analyze volumetric multimodality imaging/treatment planning/verification (ITPV) digital data. Specifically, we will (1) maintain/manage (and make incremental improvements as required to) the current electronic data submission of advanced technology (3DCRT, IMRT, SBRT, and brachytherapy) protocol credentialing and case data, archival storage, and remote QA review process utilizing ATC Method-1 (now referred to as the QuASAR-1 (Quality Assurance Submission, Analysis, and Review-1) system);(2) develop novel web-based remote-review tools that will enhance the efficient and effective review of protocols utilizing advanced technologies. The design infrastructure of these tools will assist the development of future protocol processes such as image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and adaptive radiation therapy (ART). The proposed system is referred to as QuASAR-2 and will be modular in design to promote efficient tools and subsystems development that achieve compatibility with existing software standards, including the Cancer Bioinformatics Grid (caBIG) and DICOM RT, and maintain/develop archival ITPV, credentialing/QA databases that can be linked with the cooperative group's clinical outcomes database;(3) assist cooperative groups in the development and management of advanced technology clinical trials protocols including (a) tumor/target volume and organ at risk definitions;(b) credentialing requirements and evaluation criteria;(c) electronic data submission requirements/instructions;(d) QA review procedures;and (4) serve as an educational resource to the nation's clinical trial cooperative groups and participating institutions for support of advanced technology radiation therapy clinical trials. Our ATC QA consortium approach will help avoid duplication of service/developmental efforts and promote development of uniform credentialing/QA criteria for clinical trials throughout all Cooperative Groups.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Resource-Related Research Projects--Cooperative Agreements (U24)
Project #
5U24CA081647-13
Application #
8100298
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-SRRB-9 (M2))
Program Officer
Deye, James
Project Start
1999-07-22
Project End
2014-02-28
Budget Start
2011-07-01
Budget End
2014-02-28
Support Year
13
Fiscal Year
2011
Total Cost
$1,617,336
Indirect Cost
Name
Washington University
Department
Radiation-Diagnostic/Oncology
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
068552207
City
Saint Louis
State
MO
Country
United States
Zip Code
63130
Taylor, Paige A; Kry, Stephen F; Followill, David S (2017) Pencil Beam Algorithms Are Unsuitable for Proton Dose Calculations in Lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 99:750-756
Faught, Austin M; Davidson, Scott E; Fontenot, Jonas et al. (2017) Development of a Monte Carlo multiple source model for inclusion in a dose calculation auditing tool. Med Phys 44:4943-4951
Lee, W Robert; Dignam, James J; Amin, Mahul B et al. (2016) Randomized Phase III Noninferiority Study Comparing Two Radiotherapy Fractionation Schedules in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:2325-32
Taylor, Paige A; Kry, Stephen F; Alvarez, Paola et al. (2016) Results From the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston's Anthropomorphic Phantoms Used for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:242-8
Davidson, Scott E; Cui, Jing; Kry, Stephen et al. (2016) Modification and validation of an analytical source model for external beam radiotherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations. Med Phys 43:4842
Baumann, Brian C; Bosch, Walter R; Bahl, Amit et al. (2016) Development and Validation of Consensus Contouring Guidelines for Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96:78-86
Bradley, Jeffrey D; Paulus, Rebecca; Komaki, Ritsuko et al. (2015) Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial p Lancet Oncol 16:187-99
Wu, Abraham J; Bosch, Walter R; Chang, Daniel T et al. (2015) Expert Consensus Contouring Guidelines for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 92:911-20
Hong, Theodore S; Moughan, Jennifer; Garofalo, Michael C et al. (2015) NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0822: A Phase 2 Study of Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Combination With Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 93:29-36
Viswanathan, Akila N; Moughan, Jennifer; Miller, Brigitte E et al. (2015) NRG Oncology/RTOG 0921: A phase 2 study of postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin and bevacizumab followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel for patients with endometrial cancer. Cancer 121:2156-63

Showing the most recent 10 out of 81 publications