Component 2: Research Project ? Abstract The ?Research Project? component of the Center for Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation embodies the primary scientific activities of the Center. Organizationally, the Research Project involves developing the CAGI challenges, assessing submitted predictions, and outreach to engage and educate potential predictors.
The specific aims for this component are: 1. Recruit and develop CAGI challenges. The CAGI experiment depends upon the challenge datasets donated by clinicians and researchers. We will procure datasets with clinical relevance or which provide enhanced biomedical understanding. Once a possible dataset has been identified, there is a significant investment in formulating a challenge so that assessment will both determine which approaches are most effective, and provide insight that will further advance the field. Typical research data are highly complex, with caveats and subtleties. The art of challenge design is to pose a question that is sufficiently straightforward that it can be readily understood and addressed by predictors, while incorporating enough detail to ensure accurate representation of the underlying data and ultimate research and/or clinical relevance. 2. Assess challenge predictions. Predictions are evaluated by independent assessors. Rather than aiming to determine ?winners? and ?losers,? the intent is to understand what approaches worked, and why. To both ensure fairness and to allow insight, assessment is performed in multiple stages with numerous different assessment approaches. C-CAGI will systematize the more routine assessment methodologies for consistency between challenges and across successive experiments, and will support the development of new statistical approaches for evaluating predictions. 3. Engage and educate predictors through outreach. Many researchers who could potentially contribute to genome interpretation methodologies do not have the requisite backgrounds in all of medical genetics, genomics, biochemistry and molecular biology, computer science, and statistics?yet an understanding of all of these, at some level, is necessary to succeed in CAGI. We will aim to have outreach to clinical, biological, and computer science groups to help teach them about current methods and datasets, and build teams that can work together to participate in CAGI.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
Type
Biotechnology Resource Cooperative Agreements (U41)
Project #
1U41HG007346-01A1
Application #
8883060
Study Section
National Human Genome Research Institute Initial Review Group (GNOM)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2015-05-13
Budget End
2016-04-30
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2015
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of California Berkeley
Department
Type
DUNS #
124726725
City
Berkeley
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
94704
Oetting, William S; Béroud, Christophe; Brenner, Steven E et al. (2018) Methods and tools for assessing the impact of genetic variations: The 2017 Annual Scientific Meeting of the Human Genome Variation Society. Hum Mutat 39:454-458
Dyke, Stephanie O M; Linden, Mikael; Lappalainen, Ilkka et al. (2018) Registered access: authorizing data access. Eur J Hum Genet 26:1721-1731
Lu, Jacqueline G; Bishop, Juliet; Cheyette, Sarah et al. (2018) A novel PRRT2 pathogenic variant in a family with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia and benign familial infantile seizures. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud 4:
Crawford, Dana C; Morgan, Alexander A; Denny, Joshua C et al. (2018) PRECISION MEDICINE: FROM DIPLOTYPES TO DISPARITIES TOWARDS IMPROVED HEALTH AND THERAPIES. Pac Symp Biocomput 23:389-399
Niroula, Abhishek; Vihinen, Mauno (2017) PON-P and PON-P2 predictor performance in CAGI challenges: Lessons learned. Hum Mutat 38:1085-1091
Oetting, William S; Béroud, Christophe; Brenner, Steven E et al. (2017) Non-Coding Variation: The 2016 Annual Scientific Meeting of the Human Genome Variation Society. Hum Mutat 38:460-463
Kreimer, Anat; Zeng, Haoyang; Edwards, Matthew D et al. (2017) Predicting gene expression in massively parallel reporter assays: A comparative study. Hum Mutat 38:1240-1250
Carraro, Marco; Minervini, Giovanni; Giollo, Manuel et al. (2017) Performance of in silico tools for the evaluation of p16INK4a (CDKN2A) variants in CAGI. Hum Mutat 38:1042-1050
Beer, Michael A (2017) Predicting enhancer activity and variant impact using gkm-SVM. Hum Mutat 38:1251-1258
Daneshjou, Roxana; Wang, Yanran; Bromberg, Yana et al. (2017) Working toward precision medicine: Predicting phenotypes from exomes in the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) challenges. Hum Mutat 38:1182-1192

Showing the most recent 10 out of 27 publications