): Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the cancers that our community partners have identified as a priority. It is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States, and one with significant disparities in screening, stage of diagnosis, and survival. Underinsured and uninsured adults are less likely to be screened, more likely to have their cancer diagnosed at a late stage, and less likely to survive CRC. In this project we will work with """"""""safety-net"""""""" health centers serving Medicaid and uninsured patients in St. Louis City and St. Louis County in Missouri, and in East St. Louis/St. Clair County in Illinois. Working with our Colorectal Cancer Community Partnership we planned a cluster-randomized delaved start trial to test the effectiveness of offering community health centers a """"""""Menu"""""""" of evidence-based svstems interventions for increasing rates of CRC screening. The strategies included in the Menu will be drawn from evidence-based interventions. The control condition will be usual care, but in concordance with our partners'wishes, we will offer all participating health centers access to state-of-the-art evidence-based patient education materials. The primary outcome will be CRC screening adherence as measured by self-report surveys of a random sample of health center patients. Our evaluation will also be informed by a chart audit to assess screening referral and completion, surveys of physicians and staff at intervention sites to assess implementation outcomes, and exit interviews with administration of intervention health centers to assess maintenance of the intervention strategies. We developed and will conduct our study adhering to the principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR).
The specific aims are: (1) Working with community partners, we will select and refine the evidence based intervention strategies for the trial;(2) Using a CBPR approach, we will collaborate with our partners to implement and evaluate the systems-level intervention for its effectiveness in increasing CRC screening rates. (3) Using the RE-AIM framework, we will work with our partners to evaluate implementation and maintenance of systems changes by intervention health centers and adoption of the changes by control centers. Compared to traditional clinics and healthcare providers, safety-net health centers face additional challenges in implementing evidence-based strategies for increase screening uptake;yet rigorously testing such strategies in this context is novel. Allowing health centers to select from a menu of strategies will provide a practical test of effectiveness, and will increase buy-in and representativeness of participating health centers. As a practical clinical trial with good external validity, this project has the potential for significant impact on CRC screening rates with promise for substantial impact on disparities in CRC burden. This study is responsive to community concerns about CRC and about no-intervention control groups, and is responsive to the RFA by proposing a CBPR randomized controlled trial to increase access to and utilization of CRC screening procedures.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Specialized Center--Cooperative Agreements (U54)
Project #
5U54CA153460-05
Application #
8723123
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2014-09-01
Budget End
2015-08-31
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
2014
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Washington University
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
Saint Louis
State
MO
Country
United States
Zip Code
63130
Muenks, Carol E; Sewell, Whitney C; Hogan, Patrick G et al. (2018) Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: The Effects Are More Than Skin Deep. J Pediatr 199:158-165
Warner, Wayne A; Lee, Tammy Y; Fang, Fang et al. (2018) The burden of prostate cancer in Trinidad and Tobago: one of the highest mortality rates in the world. Cancer Causes Control 29:685-697
Gehlert, Sarah; Mozersky, Jessica (2018) Seeing Beyond the Margins: Challenges to Informed Inclusion of Vulnerable Populations in Research. J Law Med Ethics 46:30-43
Khan, Saira; Hicks, Veronica; Rancilio, Danielle et al. (2018) Predictors of Follow-Up Visits Post Radical Prostatectomy. Am J Mens Health 12:760-765
Drake, Bettina F; Brown, Katherine M; Gehlert, Sarah et al. (2017) Development of Plain Language Supplemental Materials for the Biobank Informed Consent Process. J Cancer Educ 32:836-844
Drake, Bettina F; Boyd, Danielle; Carter, Kimberly et al. (2017) Barriers and Strategies to Participation in Tissue Research Among African-American Men. J Cancer Educ 32:51-58
Arnold, Lauren D; McGilvray, Martha M; Kyle Cooper, J et al. (2017) Inadequate Cancer Screening: Lack of Provider Continuity is a Greater Obstacle than Medical Mistrust. J Health Care Poor Underserved 28:362-377
Komaie, Goldie; Ekenga, Christine C; Sanders Thompson, Vetta L et al. (2017) Increasing Community Research Capacity to Address Health Disparities. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 12:55-66
Goodman, Melody S; Sanders Thompson, Vetta L; Johnson, Cassandra Arroyo et al. (2017) EVALUATING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN RESEARCH: QUANTITATIVE MEASURE DEVELOPMENT. J Community Psychol 45:17-32
Colditz, Graham A; Gehlert, Sarah; Bowen, Deborah J et al. (2016) Toward a Modern Science of Obesity at Washington University: How We Do It and What is the Payoff? Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 9:503-8

Showing the most recent 10 out of 64 publications