Every year, over 50,000 women in the United States are diagnosed with the non-lethal form of breast cancer known as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). When a diagnosis of DCIS is confirmed on biopsy, most women are treated with partial mastectomy and breast irradiation or elect total mastectomy as a means to avoid radiation therapy. Newer approaches to treatment for DCIS have suggested that surgical excision and observation, with or without endocrine therapy, may be an alternative for small volume, low grade DCIS. However, as a general rule, the underlying biology of DCIS is just beginning to be considered in the context of treating DCIS. A substantial body of basic science regarding the underlying molecular alterations present in DCIS suggests there are two major pathways of progression constituting an indolent and aggressive form of DCIS. The goal of this proposal Is to translate the research data on the numerous molecular genetic abnormalities present In DCIS into a pathology classification algorithm based on a restricted set of molecular, immunohistochemical, or morphologic features that will reliably Identify low grade and high grade progression pathways in DCIS. This would promote conservative treatment strategies for a subset of women with favorable prognosis DCIS and reduce the potential unfavorable consequences of over treating indolent breast disease.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Specialized Center--Cooperative Agreements (U54)
Project #
5U54CA163303-03
Application #
8567664
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-SRLB-R)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2013-06-01
Budget End
2014-05-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$171,970
Indirect Cost
$52,022
Name
University of Vermont & St Agric College
Department
Type
DUNS #
066811191
City
Burlington
State
VT
Country
United States
Zip Code
05405
Lee, Janie M; Abraham, Linn; Lam, Diana L et al. (2018) Cumulative Risk Distribution for Interval Invasive Second Breast Cancers After Negative Surveillance Mammography. J Clin Oncol 36:2070-2077
van den Broek, Jeroen J; van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S et al. (2018) Comparing CISNET Breast Cancer Models Using the Maximum Clinical Incidence Reduction Methodology. Med Decis Making 38:112S-125S
Mandelblatt, Jeanne S; Near, Aimee M; Miglioretti, Diana L et al. (2018) Common Model Inputs Used in CISNET Collaborative Breast Cancer Modeling. Med Decis Making 38:9S-23S
McCarthy, Anne Marie; Barlow, William E; Conant, Emily F et al. (2018) Breast Cancer With a Poor Prognosis Diagnosed After Screening Mammography With Negative Results. JAMA Oncol 4:998-1001
Alagoz, Oguzhan; Ergun, Mehmet Ali; Cevik, Mucahit et al. (2018) The University of Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model: An Update. Med Decis Making 38:99S-111S
Onega, T; Zhu, W; Weiss, J E et al. (2018) Preoperative breast MRI and mortality in older women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 170:149-157
Hill, Deirdre A; Haas, Jennifer S; Wellman, Robert et al. (2018) Utilization of breast cancer screening with magnetic resonance imaging in community practice. J Gen Intern Med 33:275-283
Conant, Emily F; Sprague, Brian L; Kontos, Despina (2018) Beyond BI-RADS Density: A Call for Quantification in the Breast Imaging Clinic. Radiology 286:401-404
Hart, Vicki; Trentham-Dietz, Amy; Berkman, Amy et al. (2018) The association between post-diagnosis health behaviors and long-term quality of life in survivors of ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based longitudinal cohort study. Qual Life Res 27:1237-1247
Schapira, Marilyn M; Barlow, William E; Conant, Emily F et al. (2018) Communication Practices of Mammography Facilities and Timely Follow-up of a Screening Mammogram with a BI-RADS 0 Assessment. Acad Radiol 25:1118-1127

Showing the most recent 10 out of 99 publications