Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) represent a new breast imaging technology recently approved by the FDA with the potential to increase cancer detection while significantly reducing the need for call back and follow up examinations. The Breast Imaging Division at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania will transition its screening practice that to DBT. Project 1 will take advantage of the transition DBT to measure screening related outcomes, xray dose and costs associated with routine DBT based screening and compare it to a cohort screened with planar digital mammography (DM). During the transition, patients will either undergo DBT or DM screening on a first come first serve basis. The comparison cohort will be the population screened at HUP with DM. Screening outcomes measured include call backs, follow ups, Ultrasound exams, biopsies and cancer. Mean gladular xray dose will be calculated for every projection of DM and DBT exams. Costs associated with the screening exam, and downstream costs associated with the diagnostic work up will be measured in both cohorts. Patients will be surveyed to determine the effect of DBT on satisfaction with the screening process and breast cancer worry. Given the lack of data related to the impact of DBT on breast cancer screening outcomes, project 1 will generate critical data to inform the more widespread implementation of this new technology.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Specialized Center--Cooperative Agreements (U54)
Project #
5U54CA163313-02
Application #
8555347
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-SRLB-R (O1))
Project Start
2011-09-21
Project End
2016-05-31
Budget Start
2012-09-01
Budget End
2013-05-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2012
Total Cost
$162,646
Indirect Cost
$60,421
Name
University of Pennsylvania
Department
Type
DUNS #
042250712
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19104
McCarthy, Anne Marie; Barlow, William E; Conant, Emily F et al. (2018) Breast Cancer With a Poor Prognosis Diagnosed After Screening Mammography With Negative Results. JAMA Oncol 4:998-1001
Conant, Emily F; Sprague, Brian L; Kontos, Despina (2018) Beyond BI-RADS Density: A Call for Quantification in the Breast Imaging Clinic. Radiology 286:401-404
Seitz, Holli H; Schapira, Marilyn M; Gibson, Laura A et al. (2018) Explaining the effects of a decision intervention on mammography intentions: The roles of worry, fear and perceived susceptibility to breast cancer. Psychol Health 33:682-700
Gastounioti, Aimilia; Oustimov, Andrew; Hsieh, Meng-Kang et al. (2018) Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Capture of Breast Parenchymal Complexity Patterns Associated with Breast Cancer Risk. Acad Radiol 25:977-984
McDonald, Elizabeth S; McCarthy, Anne Marie; Weinstein, Susan P et al. (2017) BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Radiology 285:778-787
Conant, Emily F; Keller, Brad M; Pantalone, Lauren et al. (2017) Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated Measures. Radiology 283:673-680
Wood, Marie E; Sprague, Brian L; Oustimov, Andrew et al. (2017) Aspirin use is associated with lower mammographic density in a large screening cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 162:419-425
Balasubramanian, Bijal A; Garcia, Michael P; Corley, Douglas A et al. (2017) Racial/ethnic differences in obesity and comorbidities between safety-net- and non safety-net integrated health systems. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e6326
Weiss, Julie E; Goodrich, Martha; Harris, Kimberly A et al. (2017) Challenges With Identifying Indication for Examination in Breast Imaging as a Key Clinical Attribute in Practice, Research, and Policy. J Am Coll Radiol 14:198-207.e2
Haas, Jennifer S; Barlow, William E; Schapira, Marilyn M et al. (2017) Primary Care Providers' Beliefs and Recommendations and Use of Screening Mammography by their Patients. J Gen Intern Med 32:449-457

Showing the most recent 10 out of 52 publications