The Biostatistics Core (the designated Shared Research Resources Core) will provide expert guidance and support in the biostatistical aspects of the design, conduct and analysis of research projects generated under the Penn PROSPR Research Center grant. Core staff members will collaborate with project investigators at every stage: They have already assisted in the design of proposed projects, and they will continue to work with investigators in refining design and analysis plans. As studies proceed. Core staff members will monitor study databases, participate in the evaluation of data quality, and conduct any designated interim analyses. When studies are finished. Core staff will conduct correct and efficient data analyses, create graphs and tables, assist investigators with the preparation of presentations and manuscripts, and consult on the design of subsequent research. The Core staff members have extensive experience supporting research projects of all kinds in breast cancer and other forms of cancer. In particular, they have substantial expertise in comparative effectiveness research, cancer diagnostics, health economics, and the statistical evaluation of screening programs. Thus the Core is superbly qualified to provide biostatistical support of the highest quality to PCIPS.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Specialized Center--Cooperative Agreements (U54)
Project #
5U54CA163313-03
Application #
8568130
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-SRLB-R)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2013-06-01
Budget End
2014-05-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$210,919
Indirect Cost
$78,332
Name
University of Pennsylvania
Department
Type
DUNS #
042250712
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19104
McCarthy, Anne Marie; Barlow, William E; Conant, Emily F et al. (2018) Breast Cancer With a Poor Prognosis Diagnosed After Screening Mammography With Negative Results. JAMA Oncol 4:998-1001
Conant, Emily F; Sprague, Brian L; Kontos, Despina (2018) Beyond BI-RADS Density: A Call for Quantification in the Breast Imaging Clinic. Radiology 286:401-404
Seitz, Holli H; Schapira, Marilyn M; Gibson, Laura A et al. (2018) Explaining the effects of a decision intervention on mammography intentions: The roles of worry, fear and perceived susceptibility to breast cancer. Psychol Health 33:682-700
Gastounioti, Aimilia; Oustimov, Andrew; Hsieh, Meng-Kang et al. (2018) Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Capture of Breast Parenchymal Complexity Patterns Associated with Breast Cancer Risk. Acad Radiol 25:977-984
McDonald, Elizabeth S; McCarthy, Anne Marie; Weinstein, Susan P et al. (2017) BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Radiology 285:778-787
Conant, Emily F; Keller, Brad M; Pantalone, Lauren et al. (2017) Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated Measures. Radiology 283:673-680
Wood, Marie E; Sprague, Brian L; Oustimov, Andrew et al. (2017) Aspirin use is associated with lower mammographic density in a large screening cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 162:419-425
Balasubramanian, Bijal A; Garcia, Michael P; Corley, Douglas A et al. (2017) Racial/ethnic differences in obesity and comorbidities between safety-net- and non safety-net integrated health systems. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e6326
Weiss, Julie E; Goodrich, Martha; Harris, Kimberly A et al. (2017) Challenges With Identifying Indication for Examination in Breast Imaging as a Key Clinical Attribute in Practice, Research, and Policy. J Am Coll Radiol 14:198-207.e2
Haas, Jennifer S; Barlow, William E; Schapira, Marilyn M et al. (2017) Primary Care Providers' Beliefs and Recommendations and Use of Screening Mammography by their Patients. J Gen Intern Med 32:449-457

Showing the most recent 10 out of 52 publications