CORE 2: DRIVING BIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS Three driving biological problems will focus our biocomputation research. A macroscale DBP focused on neuroprosthetic dynamics, a mesoscale DBP focused on viral and cellular dynamics, and a molecular scale DBP focused on drug target dynamics. We use seven criteria to select our Driving Biological Problems (DBPs): Canonical: The problem should be an archetype of problems in an entire field of inquiry to guarantee broad applicability of the tools we develop. ? Collectively cover a range of scales: It is critical that activities of the center cover scales from molecular through cellular to organismal levels. ? Physics-based: The DBP should present a problem that can be addressed by representing and analyzing the geometry and physics of the biological system. ? Data rich: Biology is dominated by experimental data. These data provide the real-world constraints that drive and validate models and simulations. ? World-class, engaged experimentalists: We seek close integration and deep interactions among the biological and computational participants. ? Have important implications for disease: We ensure that our DBPs are related to disease processes or treatments to ensure that they contribute to the advancement of human health. Our past DBPs met these criteria and enabled us to develop software that is now used by a very broad community of researchers. Our next three DBPs also satisfy these criteria and are briefly reviewed below.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Specialized Center--Cooperative Agreements (U54)
Project #
5U54GM072970-09
Application #
8534869
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-BST-K)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2013-09-01
Budget End
2014-08-31
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$299,115
Indirect Cost
$124,266
Name
Stanford University
Department
Type
DUNS #
009214214
City
Stanford
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
94305
Seth, Ajay; Hicks, Jennifer L; Uchida, Thomas K et al. (2018) OpenSim: Simulating musculoskeletal dynamics and neuromuscular control to study human and animal movement. PLoS Comput Biol 14:e1006223
Liu, Tianyun; Ish-Shalom, Shirbi; Torng, Wen et al. (2018) Biological and functional relevance of CASP predictions. Proteins 86 Suppl 1:374-386
Rojas, Enrique R; Billings, Gabriel; Odermatt, Pascal D et al. (2018) The outer membrane is an essential load-bearing element in Gram-negative bacteria. Nature 559:617-621
DeMers, Matthew S; Hicks, Jennifer L; Delp, Scott L (2017) Preparatory co-activation of the ankle muscles may prevent ankle inversion injuries. J Biomech 52:17-23
Rojas, Enrique R; Huang, Kerwyn Casey; Theriot, Julie A (2017) Homeostatic Cell Growth Is Accomplished Mechanically through Membrane Tension Inhibition of Cell-Wall Synthesis. Cell Syst 5:578-590.e6
Budday, S; Sommer, G; Birkl, C et al. (2017) Mechanical characterization of human brain tissue. Acta Biomater 48:319-340
Dodani, Sheel C; Kiss, Gert; Cahn, Jackson K B et al. (2016) Discovery of a regioselectivity switch in nitrating P450s guided by molecular dynamics simulations and Markov models. Nat Chem 8:419-25
Sack, Kevin L; Baillargeon, Brian; Acevedo-Bolton, Gabriel et al. (2016) Partial LVAD restores ventricular outputs and normalizes LV but not RV stress distributions in the acutely failing heart in silico. Int J Artif Organs 39:421-430
Shukla, Diwakar; Peck, Ariana; Pande, Vijay S (2016) Conformational heterogeneity of the calmodulin binding interface. Nat Commun 7:10910
Rajagopal, Apoorva; Dembia, Christopher L; DeMers, Matthew S et al. (2016) Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model for Muscle-Driven Simulation of Human Gait. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 63:2068-79

Showing the most recent 10 out of 256 publications