Small grants to conduct pilot projects are a well-proven and pivotal mechanism for the establishment and capacity building of a successful, sustainable research program. They allow investigators to establish and test new collaborations and ideas, collecting preliminary data to demonstrate the feasibility of important clinical and translational research projects. Without a mechanism to evaluate the soundness of new ideas, it will be impossible to develop a high-quality research program and to successfully secure future NIH research grants. This opportunity to test new ideas and collaborations is critical because the DE-CTR depends on the establishment of cross-institutional partnerships. To be funded, pilot projects will be required to involve a partnership of faculty from at least two institutions. These partnerships will include not just local Delaware institutions (the University of Delaware, Nemours, Christiana Care, etc.), but also institutions in other IDeA states, specifically, our partners at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC). Projects funded under the Clinical and Translational Pilot Grants Program will have to be translational in nature. Collaborative research between basic, clinical, and translational researchers from different disciplines, departments, and/or programs within or across institutions will be encouraged, and at least one ofthe Pilot Projects funded at any time will have to be fundamentally clinical in nature. The pilot project grants will provide an opportunity to create a community of medical research that has a strong mentorship component. To grow the base of NIH-funded investigators, PIs of pilot projects will generally be junior faculty without prior NIH funding. Each junior faculty member will be required to have a mentor who has undergone mentorship training through an established faculty mentorship program. Both junior faculty and mentors are expected to participate in DE-CTR events, retreats and planning meetings so they become a part of the DE-CTR community. We intend to fund seven pilot projects at any given time after the initial year (Year 1 will only have four pilot projects, allowing us time to establish the program). Each pilot grant proposal may request up to $88,500 in direct costs per year. Funding will be provided for a single year with an option for a second year based on meritorious review. Most ofthe funding awarded is expected to be used for research assistant stipends and laboratory equipment and supplies. PI salary will be discouraged, as institutions are required to provide faculty release time. All pilot project PIs that are junior faculty (the majority) will be required to have a scientific mentor. Projects will be selected based on a two-stage review process. Priority scores will be given by members ofthe DE-CTR Research Committee, and funding decisions will be made by the DE-CTR External Advisory Committee.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Specialized Center--Cooperative Agreements (U54)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZGM1-TWD-C (CC))
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
University of Delaware
United States
Zip Code
Richards, Dylan J; Tan, Yu; Coyle, Robert et al. (2016) Nanowires and Electrical Stimulation Synergistically Improve Functions of hiPSC Cardiac Spheroids. Nano Lett 16:4670-8
Hsiao, HaoYuan; Awad, Louis N; Palmer, Jacqueline A et al. (2016) Contribution of Paretic and Nonparetic Limb Peak Propulsive Forces to Changes in Walking Speed in Individuals Poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 30:743-52
Awad, Louis N; Reisman, Darcy S; Pohlig, Ryan T et al. (2016) Identifying candidates for targeted gait rehabilitation after stroke: better prediction through biomechanics-informed characterization. J Neuroeng Rehabil 13:84
White, Daniel K; Neogi, Tuhina; Nguyen, Uyen-Sa D T et al. (2016) Trajectories of functional decline in knee osteoarthritis: the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Rheumatology (Oxford) 55:801-8
Yang, Chia-Shing; Marshall, Erik S; Fanari, Zaher et al. (2016) Discrepancies between direct catheter and echocardiography-based values in aortic stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 87:488-97
Chen, Xingyu; Zhou, Yilu; Wang, Liyun et al. (2016) Determining Tension-Compression Nonlinear Mechanical Properties of Articular Cartilage from Indentation Testing. Ann Biomed Eng 44:1148-58
Sood, Erica; Pinder, Wendy; Pendley, Jennifer S et al. (2016) Provider Communication Regarding Psychosocial Factors Predicts Pain Beliefs in Parent and Child. J Dev Behav Pediatr 37:205-12
Weintraub, William S; Garratt, Kirk N (2016) Should Chronic Total Occlusion Be Treated With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting? Chronic Total Occlusion Should Not Routinely Be Treated With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Circulation 133:1818-25
Fanari, Zaher; Rajamanickam, Anitha; Grove, Mathew et al. (2016) Impact of Catheterization Lab Computer Software Settings on Hemodynamic Assessment of Aortic Stenosis. Del Med J 88:212-217
Awad, Louis N; Reisman, Darcy S; Pohlig, Ryan T et al. (2016) Reducing The Cost of Transport and Increasing Walking Distance After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Fast Locomotor Training Combined With Functional Electrical Stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 30:661-70

Showing the most recent 10 out of 63 publications