Small grants to conduct pilot projects are a well-proven and pivotal mechanism for the establishment and capacity building of a successful, sustainable research program. They allow investigators to establish and test new collaborations and ideas, collecting preliminary data to demonstrate the feasibility of important clinical and translational research projects. Without a mechanism to evaluate the soundness of new ideas, it will be impossible to develop a high-quality research program and to successfully secure future NIH research grants. This opportunity to test new ideas and collaborations is critical because the DE-CTR depends on the establishment of cross-institutional partnerships. To be funded, pilot projects will be required to involve a partnership of faculty from at least two institutions. These partnerships will include not just local Delaware institutions (the University of Delaware, Nemours, Christiana Care, etc.), but also institutions in other IDeA states, specifically, our partners at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC). Projects funded under the Clinical and Translational Pilot Grants Program will have to be translational in nature. Collaborative research between basic, clinical, and translational researchers from different disciplines, departments, and/or programs within or across institutions will be encouraged, and at least one ofthe Pilot Projects funded at any time will have to be fundamentally clinical in nature. The pilot project grants will provide an opportunity to create a community of medical research that has a strong mentorship component. To grow the base of NIH-funded investigators, PIs of pilot projects will generally be junior faculty without prior NIH funding. Each junior faculty member will be required to have a mentor who has undergone mentorship training through an established faculty mentorship program. Both junior faculty and mentors are expected to participate in DE-CTR events, retreats and planning meetings so they become a part of the DE-CTR community. We intend to fund seven pilot projects at any given time after the initial year (Year 1 will only have four pilot projects, allowing us time to establish the program). Each pilot grant proposal may request up to $88,500 in direct costs per year. Funding will be provided for a single year with an option for a second year based on meritorious review. Most ofthe funding awarded is expected to be used for research assistant stipends and laboratory equipment and supplies. PI salary will be discouraged, as institutions are required to provide faculty release time. All pilot project PIs that are junior faculty (the majority) will be required to have a scientific mentor. Projects will be selected based on a two-stage review process. Priority scores will be given by members ofthe DE-CTR Research Committee, and funding decisions will be made by the DE-CTR External Advisory Committee.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Specialized Center--Cooperative Agreements (U54)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZGM1-TWD-C)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
University of Delaware
United States
Zip Code
Di Guglielmo, Matthew D; Tonb, Dalal; He, Zhaoping et al. (2017) A Pilot Study Measuring The Novel Satiety Hormone, Pro-Uroguanylin, In Adolescents With And Without Obesity. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr :
Riley, Rachel S; Day, Emily S (2017) Gold nanoparticle-mediated photothermal therapy: applications and opportunities for multimodal cancer treatment. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 9:
Svigals, Philip Z; Chopra, Amit; Ravenel, James G et al. (2017) The accuracy of pleural ultrasonography in diagnosing complicated parapneumonic pleural effusions. Thorax 72:94-95
Whitney, Daniel G; Singh, Harshvardhan; Miller, Freeman et al. (2017) Cortical bone deficit and fat infiltration of bone marrow and skeletal muscle in ambulatory children with mild spastic cerebral palsy. Bone 94:90-97
Weintraub, William S (2017) Perspective on Trends in Statin Use. JAMA Cardiol 2:11-12
Klein, Lloyd W; Harjai, Kishore J; Resnic, Fred et al. (2017) 2016 Revision of the SCAI position statement on public reporting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 89:269-279
Driscoll, Jeremy N; Bender, Brian M; Archilla, Carlos A et al. (2017) Comparing incidence of emergence delirium between sevoflurane and desflurane in children following routine otolaryngology procedures. Minerva Anestesiol 83:383-391
Shin, Ju Young; Pohlig, Ryan T; Habermann, Barbara (2017) Beliefs About Use of Complementary Health Approaches for Parkinson's Disease. Holist Nurs Pract 31:290-294
Dominick, Gregory M; Winfree, Kyle N; Pohlig, Ryan T et al. (2017) Authors' Reply to: Critique of ""Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions"" - Does Location of the Device Matter? JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 5:e13
Weintraub, William S; Garratt, Kirk N (2017) Public Reporting II: State of the Art-Current Public Reporting in Cardiovascular Medicine. Circulation 135:1772-1774

Showing the most recent 10 out of 201 publications