The focus of the policy section is on developing a set of methods that focus both modelers and policymakers on models in a way that makes decision alternatives clearer and improves the power of data and of models to inform policy. The overall strategy is called Inference Robustness Assessment (IRA). It encapsulates basic traditions in science into two iterative processes. The first assesses the validity of inferences made from a particular model form by realistically relaxing simplifying assumptions in that model form and assessing whether greater realism has the potential to change the inferences made when analyzing the model and analyzing data with the model. This iterative loop is pursued when there is enough data to make a definitive inference about policy. When there is not enough data, a second identifiability analysis loop is pursued to determine what additional data will best inform a decision. Identifiability means that data can determine model characteristics uniquely. For example only one policy choice is consistent with the data. The IRA approach does not focus on parameter identifiability as traditional identifiability analysis does. It focuses on making inferences identifiable which may occur even when no parameters are identifiable. A key to making science serve policy using IRA is to begin with simple policy choices of high relevance to the policymakers and with simple models that have face validity for potentially informing that policy choice. We will examine aspects of communication between modelers and policymakers to establish good beginnings leading to successful policymaking. Quite often policy choices entail doing things with limited resources. A key to making models policy relevant is, therefore, incorporating parameters and structures to enable cost effectiveness and cost benefit analyses using the model. Policy choices can be influenced by the chances of different outcomes given different policy decisions. Therefore IRA incorporates a full range of deterministic to stochastic models and employs Bayesian inference to establish the joint ranges of model parameters that are consistent with data. This approach has the advantage that while pursuing the best scientifically supported inference, it is able to inform a policy choice at any level of depth into the IRA process.

Public Health Relevance

This project develops methods that focus models, modelers, and policymakers in a coordinated manner that best informs policy. Those methods help policymakers see more clearly how different processes involved in infection transmission affect their decisions. They also help modelers see what they have to do to best relate to the decisions of policymakers. Finally they establish the validity of model based policy inferences.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Specialized Center--Cooperative Agreements (U54)
Project #
1U54GM111274-01
Application #
8796480
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZGM1-BBCB-5 (MI))
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2014-09-12
Budget End
2015-06-30
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2014
Total Cost
$217,214
Indirect Cost
$32,067
Name
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Department
Type
DUNS #
078200995
City
Seattle
State
WA
Country
United States
Zip Code
98109
Dean, Natalie E; Halloran, M Elizabeth; Longini, Ira M (2018) DESIGN OF VACCINE TRIALS DURING OUTBREAKS WITH AND WITHOUT A DELAYED VACCINATION COMPARATOR. Ann Appl Stat 12:330-347
Bento, Ana I; Riolo, Maria A; Choi, Yoon H et al. (2018) Core pertussis transmission groups in England and Wales: A tale of two eras. Vaccine 36:1160-1166
Moore, James; Ahmed, Hasan; Jia, Jonathan et al. (2018) What Controls the Acute Viral Infection Following Yellow Fever Vaccination? Bull Math Biol 80:46-63
Ajelli, Marco; Zhang, Qian; Sun, Kaiyuan et al. (2018) The RAPIDD Ebola forecasting challenge: Model description and synthetic data generation. Epidemics 22:3-12
Domenech de Cellès, Matthieu; Magpantay, Felicia M G; King, Aaron A et al. (2018) The impact of past vaccination coverage and immunity on pertussis resurgence. Sci Transl Med 10:
Dinh, Vu; Tung Ho, Lam Si; Suchard, Marc A et al. (2018) Consistency and convergence rate of phylogenetic inference via regularization. Ann Stat 46:1481-1512
Yang, Yang; Meng, Ya; Halloran, M Elizabeth et al. (2018) Reply to Aguiar and Stollenwerk. Clin Infect Dis 66:642
Bretó, Carles (2018) Modeling and inference for infectious disease dynamics: a likelihood-based approach. Stat Sci 33:57-69
Doud, Michael B; Lee, Juhye M; Bloom, Jesse D (2018) How single mutations affect viral escape from broad and narrow antibodies to H1 influenza hemagglutinin. Nat Commun 9:1386
Moore, James; Ahmed, Hasan; Antia, Rustom (2018) High dimensional random walks can appear low dimensional: Application to influenza H3N2 evolution. J Theor Biol 447:56-64

Showing the most recent 10 out of 134 publications