The goal of this UMI proposal is to address the technological, analytical, and ethical challenges that prevent the optimal use of DNA sequencing to improve treatment of diseases and life planning for patients and their families. High-throughput DNA sequencing will be applied to meet the major diagnostic needs of children with developmental delay, intellectual disability, and related health problems (""""""""DD/ID""""""""). DD/ID disorders inflict life-long suffering for affected children and their families, and are a major heath care and economic burden to society. They are generally highly likely driven by one or a few highly penetrant, often de novo, mutations in any given family, but most children cannot be accurately diagnosed, making treatment and family counseling difficult. Indeed, many affected families undergo a """"""""diagnostic odyssey"""""""", involving years of testing and doctor visits without a specific diagnosis. This proposal builds collaboration between genomics researchers at the Hudson Alpha Institute, local medical geneticists affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and investigators at the University of Louisville interested in the ethical, legal, and social consequences of genetic information in the clinic. 600 children with DD/ID and their parents will be enrolled, consented, and questioned about their medical experiences and expectations about genetic information. 500 of these children and their parents will be subjected to a 2-stage sequencing plan: 1) """"""""whole exome sequencing"""""""" and 2) """"""""CNV sequencing"""""""". The former is a cost-effective strategy for identifying relevant variants, particularl for the early onset, severe, and often de novo phenotypes of DD/ID. The latter is a novel strategy with great potential to identify relevant regulatory mutations, which are ignored in typical clinical sequencing strategies. Medically relevant variants, either causal for DD/ID or incidental but predictive for other diseases, will be returned to the family by a medical geneticis and genetics counselor. Follow-up questionnaires and interviews will be used to determine the impact of the returned genomic information on clinical care, family planning, and other aspects of self-perception and well-being that may be altered as a result of the genetic diagnosis and incidental findings. Related questions about risks and benefits of probabilistic information and genomic information that does not lead to specific treatments will also be studied. This highly innovative study design will address a significant clinical need and important unmet challenges that slow or dilute the effectiveness of genomic information in the clinic.
New DNA sequencing technologies hold great promise to impact patients and their families, especially those with severe diseases driven by genetic variants. However, unmet challenges slow progress in genomic medicine. This proposal defines an innovative study to improve diagnoses for children with developmental delay, intellectual disability, and related problems, and also to evaluate how the affected children and their families respond to and benefit from genome-based changes to their diagnosis and clinical care.
|Amendola, Laura M; Jarvik, Gail P; Leo, Michael C et al. (2016) Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 98:1067-76|
|Rasmussen, Luke V; Overby, Casey L; Connolly, John et al. (2016) Practical considerations for implementing genomic information resources. Experiences from eMERGE and CSER. Appl Clin Inform 7:870-82|
|O'Daniel, Julianne M; McLaughlin, Heather M; Amendola, Laura M et al. (2016) A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories. Genet Med :|
|Green, Robert C; Goddard, Katrina A B; Jarvik, Gail P et al. (2016) Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine. Am J Hum Genet 98:1051-66|
|Brothers, Kyle B; East, Kelly M; Kelley, Whitley V et al. (2016) Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results. Genet Med :|
|Brothers, Kyle B; Holm, Ingrid A; Childerhose, Janet E et al. (2016) When Participants in Genomic Research Grow Up: Contact and Consent at the Age of Majority. J Pediatr 168:226-31.e1|
|Shirts, Brian H; Salama, Joseph S; Aronson, Samuel J et al. (2015) CSER and eMERGE: current and potential state of the display of genetic information in the electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 22:1231-42|
|Cooper, Gregory M (2015) Parlez-vous VUS? Genome Res 25:1423-6|
|Amendola, Laura M; Dorschner, Michael O; Robertson, Peggy D et al. (2015) Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification. Genome Res 25:305-15|
|McCullough, Laurence B; Brothers, Kyle B; Chung, Wendy K et al. (2015) Professionally Responsible Disclosure of Genomic Sequencing Results in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics 136:e974-82|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 15 publications