MRI is increasingly used to assess cartilage, with the overall goal of relating noninvasive measurements to the actual biophysical status of the tissue. There are a variety of available MR techniques and image contrast mechanisms that can be evaluated in terms of their ability to characterize tissue status, both in experimental preparations and in the clinical setting: T2 is sensitive to tissue hydration, collagen content, and collagen orientation with respect to the main magnetic field; diffusion (D) is sensitive to macromolecular content and hydration; T1 is sensitive primarily to PG content, as is the dGEMRIC index. Magnetization transfer (MT) studies primarily reflect collagen content. Heteronuclear studies have also been performed, with the Na+ signal intensity being sensitive to local PG content. All of these measurements exhibit utility in certain circumstances. However, all are of limited specificity, with a large overlap observed between values measured in normal cartilage and e.g. degraded cartilage, or between different regions of cartilage. Parameter combinations can be more specific than single parameters; a variety of multi-parametric approaches have been applied, particularly to image segmentation. A robust approach is k-means clustering. In our application, cluster centroids are calculated based on a scatterplot with respect to measured parameters. A data point is then assigned to the cluster with the closer centroid. There will be a certain number of misclassifications with real, imperfectly clustered, data, but the analysis is expected to be substantially more accurate than univariate classifications. One factor determining the success of the algorithm is the degree of independence of the measured parameters, so that careful selection of these is essential. Similarly, clustering can be performed with any number of independent outcome variables; the two-parameter case was illustrated above. These outcome variables can also be derived from entirely different modalities, such as use of MRI in conjunction with FT-IRIS outcome measures. A further extension of the basic k-means clustering algorithm is fuzzy k-means, where tissue is designated as belonging to a particular cluster to a specified degree. This is of particular utility when the dataset does not break into defined clusters, as in cartilage analysis. An additional extension of the basic algorithm removes the requirement for pre-defining the number of clusters within the data. This may not be required in experimental situations in which the goal is to distinguish two discrete groups, such as normal and degraded cartilage. However, it may be very useful in realistic situations with more subtle gradations of tissue quality. Finally, we note that different distance metrics may be applied, permitting relative weighting of the outcome measures. We have tried multiple approaches to this problem, with the best results to date resulting from a cluster analysis based on parameterized cluster shapes, sizes, and orientations. Additional analysis has demonstrated that under severe degradation, the conventional univariate analysis based on comparison of sample values with category means provides reasonable sensitivity and specificity. However, with more subtle degradation, we have found that model-based classification using Gaussian clusters is substantially more effective for classification. The probabalistic nature of this analysis lends itself readily to fuzzy clustering as well. While our application has been to cartilage degradation, the approach is much more general and may be useful in materials classification in general with magnetic resonance. Current work is centered around application of support vector machine analysis and other types of low-dimensional multivariate analyses of degraded cartilage. We find that this SVM approach may have significant advantages, in particular through a minimization of the over-training potential that occurs when developing a model with a training set for use on validation samples. In addition, the SVM, like the Gaussian clustering approach, lends itself to a graded assessment of cartilage degradation. This is through a sigmoidal probability function of the distance of a sample in parameter space from the decision hyper surface. An additional approach is the development of 1D and 2D relaxometery and related experimental approaches. In these experiments, correlated data is obtained for two (or in some circumstances, 3) MR parameters simultaneously. This permit characterization of water pools in the tissue. This is an emerging methodology in MR, and we have successfully performed and published the first higher-dimensional approach using compressed sensing. We are currently developing discriminant functions based on three metrics in both one variable and two variables. These permit the translation of means and standard deviations to sensitivity and specificity of derived statistical tests. These results are general and can be applied to a wide variety of medical diagnostic tests.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Investigator-Initiated Intramural Research Projects (ZIA)
Project #
1ZIAAG000922-09
Application #
9351980
Study Section
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
2016
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Aging
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
State
Country
Zip Code
Ashinsky, Beth G; Bouhrara, Mustapha; Coletta, Christopher E et al. (2017) Predicting early symptomatic osteoarthritis in the human knee using machine learning classification of magnetic resonance images from the osteoarthritis initiative. J Orthop Res 35:2243-2250
Ashinsky, Beth G; Fishbein, Kenneth W; Carter, Erin M et al. (2016) Multiparametric Classification of Skin from Osteogenesis Imperfecta Patients and Controls by Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Microimaging. PLoS One 11:e0157891
Reiter, David A; Magin, Richard L; Li, Weiguo et al. (2016) Anomalous T2 relaxation in normal and degraded cartilage. Magn Reson Med 76:953-62
Lukas, Vanessa A; Fishbein, Kenneth W; Reiter, David A et al. (2015) Sensitivity and specificity of univariate MRI analysis of experimentally degraded cartilage under clinical imaging conditions. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:136-44
Lukas, Vanessa A; Fishbein, Kenneth W; Lin, Ping-Chang et al. (2015) Classification of histologically scored human knee osteochondral plugs by quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance images at 3T. J Orthop Res 33:640-50
Ashinsky, B G; Coletta, C E; Bouhrara, M et al. (2015) Machine learning classification of OARSI-scored human articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 23:1704-12
Spencer, Richard G; Pleshko, Nancy (2013) How do statistical differences in matrix-sensitive magnetic resonance outcomes translate into clinical assignment rules? J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:438-9
Irrechukwu, Onyi N; Reiter, David A; Lin, Ping-Chang et al. (2012) Characterization of engineered cartilage constructs using multiexponential T? relaxation analysis and support vector regression. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 18:433-43
Lin, Ping-Chang; Irrechukwu, Onyi; Roque, Remy et al. (2012) Multivariate analysis of cartilage degradation using the support vector machine algorithm. Magn Reson Med 67:1815-26
Reiter, David A; Irrechukwu, Onyi; Lin, Ping-Chang et al. (2012) Improved MR-based characterization of engineered cartilage using multiexponential T2 relaxation and multivariate analysis. NMR Biomed 25:476-88

Showing the most recent 10 out of 20 publications