A typical scene contains many different objects that compete for neural representation due to the limited processing capacity of the visual system. At the neural level, competition among multiple stimuli is evidenced by the mutual suppression of their visually evoked responses and occurs most strongly at the level of the receptive field. The competition among multiple objects can be biased by both bottom-up sensory-driven mechanisms (exogenous attention), such as stimulus salience, and top-down, goal-directed influences, such as selective (endogenous) attention. Although the competition among stimuli for representation is ultimately resolved within visual cortex, the source of top-down biasing signals likely derives from a distributed network of areas in frontal and parietal cortex. We previously reported that monkeys with lesions of prefrontal cortex (PFC) are impaired in their ability to switch top-down control. We then asked whether monkeys with lesions of posterior parietal cortex (PPC) would show similar or different behavioral effects. Our results showed that, unlike monkeys with PFC lesions, those with PPC lesions are not selectively impaired in their ability to switch top-down control. Rather, they have a selective impairment in spatially locating targets they are required to discriminate. Thus, the PFC plays a critical role in the ability to switch attentional control on the basis of changing task demands, whereas the PPC plays a critical role in allocating attentional resources to behaviorally relevant spatial locations. Another major goal has been to better characterize the nature of distractibility in ADHD by testing hypotheses about whether distractibility arises from increased sensory-driven interference or from inefficient top-down control. We employed an attentional filtering paradigm in which discrimination difficulty and distractor salience were parametrically manipulated. Increased discrimination difficulty should add to the load of top-down processes, whereas increased distractor salience should result in stronger sensory interference. We found a striking interaction of discrimination difficulty and distractor salience: For difficult discriminations, ADHD children filtered distractors as efficiently as healthy children and adults, and all groups were slower to respond with high vs. low salience distractors. In contrast, for easy discriminations, ADHD children were much slower and made more errors than healthy children and adults. For easy discriminations, healthy children and adults filtered out high salience distractors as easily as low salience distractors, but ADHD children were slower to respond on trials with low salience distractors than on trials with high salience distractors. The fact that ADHD children exhibit efficient attentional filtering when task demands are high, but show deficient and atypical distractor filtering under low task demands suggests that filtering mechanisms remain intact in these children but the trigger for activating attention is selectively impaired. Retinotopic selectivity, as measured by neuronal activity patterns that vary consistently with the location of visual stimuli, has been documented in many human brain regions, notably occipital visual cortex and frontal and parietal regions associated with endogenous (voluntary, goal-directed) attention. We hypothesized that retinotopic selectivity also exists in regions active during exogenous (involuntary, sensory-driven) attention. To test this hypothesis, we acquired fMRI data while subjects maintained fixation on a central cross. At unpredictable time intervals, stimuli consisting of an array of rapidly expanding circles appeared at one of six spatial locations. Positive fMRI activations to the stimulus presentations were identified in multiple brain regions including the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), a region previously implicated in exogenous attention. The TPJ activations did not appear to be organized as a map across the cortical surface. However, multi-voxel pattern recognition analysis successfully predicted fMRI responses to every one of the fifteen stimulus location pairs, demonstrating that patterns of activity in TPJ depend on the retinotopic stimulus location. This is the first demonstration that spatial locations are represented in a brain region associated with exogenous attention. Previous research has suggested that the right middle frontal gyrys (rMFG) may serve as a node of interaction between neural networks for top-down goal-directed endogenous attention and bottom-up, stimulus-driven exogenous attention. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the performance on an orientation discrimination task of a patient with a rMFG resection (to remove a brain tumor) and healthy controls. On endogenous attention trials, a valid central cue predicted with 90% accuracy the location of a perithreshold Gabor patch. On the 10% invalid trials, the Gabor patch appeared in the opposite location to the cue. On exogenous attention trials, a cue appeared briefly at one of two peripheral locations, followed, after a variable interstimulus interval (ISI;range 0 to 700 ms), by a Gabor patch in either the same (valid) or opposite location (invalid). Analysis of behavioral data showed that for both patient and controls, valid cues facilitated faster reaction times compared to invalid cues, on endogenous and short ISI exogenous trials. However, at longer ISI exogenous trials, the patient was unable to withhold his responses, resulting in reduced performance compared to controls. This may be related to the patients inability to reorient attention in a top-down fashion after the effect of the exogenous cue has dissipated, and suggests a putative role of the rMFG in switching between exogenous and endogenous modes of attention.

Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
U.S. National Institute of Mental Health
Zip Code
Kaskan, P M; Costa, V D; Eaton, H P et al. (2016) Learned Value Shapes Responses to Objects in Frontal and Ventral Stream Networks in Macaque Monkeys. Cereb Cortex :
Bell, Andrew H; Summerfield, Christopher; Morin, Elyse L et al. (2016) Encoding of Stimulus Probability in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex. Curr Biol 26:2280-90
Gattass, Ricardo; Lima, Bruss; Soares, Juliana G M et al. (2015) Controversies about the visual areas located at the anterior border of area V2 in primates. Vis Neurosci 32:E019
Zachariou, Valentinos; Nikas, Christine V; Safiullah, Zaid N et al. (2015) Common Dorsal Stream Substrates for the Mapping of Surface Texture to Object Parts and Visual Spatial Processing. J Cogn Neurosci 27:2442-61
Japee, Shruti; Holiday, Kelsey; Satyshur, Maureen D et al. (2015) A role of right middle frontal gyrus in reorienting of attention: a case study. Front Syst Neurosci 9:23
Avidan, Galia; Tanzer, Michal; Hadj-Bouziane, Fadila et al. (2014) Selective dissociation between core and extended regions of the face processing network in congenital prosopagnosia. Cereb Cortex 24:1565-78
Gattass, Ricardo; Galkin, Thelma W; Desimone, Robert et al. (2014) Subcortical connections of area V4 in the macaque. J Comp Neurol 522:1941-65
Yue, Xiaomin; Pourladian, Irene S; Tootell, Roger B H et al. (2014) Curvature-processing network in macaque visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:E3467-75
Morin, Elyse L; Hadj-Bouziane, Fadila; Stokes, Mark et al. (2014) Hierarchical Encoding of Social Cues in Primate Inferior Temporal Cortex. Cereb Cortex :
Gattass, Ricardo; Soares, Juliana G M; Desimone, Robert et al. (2014) Connectional subdivision of the claustrum: two visuotopic subdivisions in the macaque. Front Syst Neurosci 8:63

Showing the most recent 10 out of 26 publications