The goal of the Protocol Review and Monitoring System (PRMS) at the Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center (WFBCCC) is to provide systematic internal review and oversight of all cancer-related studies without duplicating traditional peer review.
The Specific Aims of the PRMS are to 1) prioritizing all cancer clinical trials, regardless of source, proposed to be conducted at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center; 2) reviewing the scientific merit of all investigator-initiated cancer clinical trials proposed to be conducted at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center; and 3) conducting ongoing review of study accrual and scientific progress of WFBCCC clinical trials. The PRMS process is supported by Disease-Oriented Teams, the Operations Protocol Service, the Protocol Review Committee, and the Clinical Research Oversight Committee. Cancer-related protocols thus are initially developed by Disease-Oriented Team concept review, prioritized within the Disease- Oriented Team portfolio, and then reviewed by the Operations Protocol Service for logistical considerations and the Protocol Review Committee for scientific merit and final prioritization. Monitoring of accrual and scientific progress, including biostatistical reports and interim endpoint analyses, are carried out by the Clinical Research Oversight Committee, with Disease-Oriented Team support. In the most recent grant year, 111 trials were reviewed by the Protocol Review Committee and 280 trials were monitored by the Clinical Research Oversight Committee.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
5P30CA012197-45
Application #
9848539
Study Section
Subcommittee H - Clinical Groups (NCI)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2020-02-01
Budget End
2021-01-31
Support Year
45
Fiscal Year
2020
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Department
Type
DUNS #
937727907
City
Winston-Salem
State
NC
Country
United States
Zip Code
27157
Paek, M-S; Nightingale, C L; Tooze, J A et al. (2018) Contextual and stress process factors associated with head and neck cancer caregivers' physical and psychological well-being. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 27:e12833
Dutta, Samrat; Rivetti, Claudio; Gassman, Natalie R et al. (2018) Analysis of single, cisplatin-induced DNA bends by atomic force microscopy and simulations. J Mol Recognit 31:e2731
Pardee, Timothy S; Anderson, Rebecca G; Pladna, Kristin M et al. (2018) A Phase I Study of CPI-613 in Combination with High-Dose Cytarabine and Mitoxantrone for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 24:2060-2073
Atkins, Hannah M; Appt, Susan E; Taylor, Robert N et al. (2018) Systemic Iron Deficiency in a Nonhuman Primate Model of Endometriosis. Comp Med 68:298-307
Godwin, Ryan C; Gmeiner, William H; Salsbury Jr, Freddie R (2018) All-atom molecular dynamics comparison of disease-associated zinc fingers. J Biomol Struct Dyn 36:2581-2594
Yang, M; Forbes, M E; Bitting, R L et al. (2018) Incorporating blood-based liquid biopsy information into cancer staging: time for a TNMB system? Ann Oncol 29:311-323
Votanopoulos, Konstantinos Ioannis; Bartlett, David; Moran, Brendan et al. (2018) PCI is Not Predictive of Survival After Complete CRS/HIPEC in Peritoneal Dissemination from High-Grade Appendiceal Primaries. Ann Surg Oncol 25:674-678
Lamar, Zanetta S; Dothard, Andrew; Kennedy, LeAnne et al. (2018) Hyperglycemia during first-line R-CHOP or dose adjusted R-EPOCH chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma is prevalent and associated with chemotherapy alteration - a retrospective study. Leuk Lymphoma 59:1871-1877
Melvin, Ryan L; Xiao, Jiajie; Berenhaut, Kenneth S et al. (2018) Using correlated motions to determine sufficient sampling times for molecular dynamics. Phys Rev E 98:023307
Bhatt, Nikunj B; Pandya, Darpan N; Dezarn, William A et al. (2018) Practical Guidelines for Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging with Clinically Relevant Isotopes. Methods Mol Biol 1790:197-208

Showing the most recent 10 out of 548 publications