PROGRAM PLANNING AND EVALUATIONThe Cancer Center has benefited from broad participation of the membership in its planning andimplementation process. In addition, it has taken advantage of formal and ad hoc consultations that havehad a major impact on program development. The leadership intends to continue to receive outsideconsultation, as well as advice from within the institution as it goes forward.External Scientific Advisory BoardThe development of the Cancer Center has been to a large extent guided by the advice of the ExternalScientific Advisory Board, which has convened on two occasions (March, 2004 and May, 2005) on theStanford campus to comment on progress in the recruitment of the senior leadership and to evaluate theresearch programs and shared resources. This Board is constituted of highly experienced scientists,administrators and leaders from the cancer research community, all of whom have considerableexpertise in the planning and evaluation of NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Their inputhas been invaluable and has continued to the time of submission of this proposal with consultationsthrough telephone and e-mail. This Board will provide an ongoing source of consultation to theleadership as it evaluates its current activities and develops new initiatives.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
1P30CA124435-01
Application #
7438412
Study Section
Subcommittee G - Education (NCI)
Project Start
2007-06-04
Project End
2010-05-31
Budget Start
2007-06-04
Budget End
2008-05-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2007
Total Cost
$118,751
Indirect Cost
Name
Stanford University
Department
Type
DUNS #
009214214
City
Stanford
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
94305
Nair, Viswam S; Sundaram, Vandana; Desai, Manisha et al. (2018) Accuracy of Models to Identify Lung Nodule Cancer Risk in the National Lung Screening Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 197:1220-1223
She, Richard; Jarosz, Daniel F (2018) Mapping Causal Variants with Single-Nucleotide Resolution Reveals Biochemical Drivers of Phenotypic Change. Cell 172:478-490.e15
Champion, Magali; Brennan, Kevin; Croonenborghs, Tom et al. (2018) Module Analysis Captures Pancancer Genetically and Epigenetically Deregulated Cancer Driver Genes for Smoking and Antiviral Response. EBioMedicine 27:156-166
Zhou, Mu; Leung, Ann; Echegaray, Sebastian et al. (2018) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Radiogenomics Map Identifies Relationships between Molecular and Imaging Phenotypes with Prognostic Implications. Radiology 286:307-315
Pollom, Erqi L; Fujimoto, Dylann K; Han, Summer S et al. (2018) Newly diagnosed glioblastoma: adverse socioeconomic factors correlate with delay in radiotherapy initiation and worse overall survival. J Radiat Res 59:i11-i18
Nørgaard, Caroline Holm; Jakobsen, Lasse Hjort; Gentles, Andrew J et al. (2018) Subtype assignment of CLL based on B-cell subset associated gene signatures from normal bone marrow - A proof of concept study. PLoS One 13:e0193249
Im, Hogune; Rao, Varsha; Sridhar, Kunju et al. (2018) Distinct transcriptomic and exomic abnormalities within myelodysplastic syndrome marrow cells. Leuk Lymphoma 59:2952-2962
Huang, Min; Zhu, Li; Garcia, Jacqueline S et al. (2018) Brd4 regulates the expression of essential autophagy genes and Keap1 in AML cells. Oncotarget 9:11665-11676
Chiou, Shin-Heng; Dorsch, Madeleine; Kusch, Eva et al. (2018) Hmga2 is dispensable for pancreatic cancer development, metastasis, and therapy resistance. Sci Rep 8:14008
Breslow, David K; Hoogendoorn, Sascha; Kopp, Adam R et al. (2018) A CRISPR-based screen for Hedgehog signaling provides insights into ciliary function and ciliopathies. Nat Genet 50:460-471

Showing the most recent 10 out of 322 publications