Research Methods Core: Partnered research presents diverse methodological challenges. Drawing on diverse scientific paradigms and disciplines, we propose an Interdisciplinary Partnered Methods Core (or """"""""Methods Core"""""""" for short) to support the mission of the proposed NIMH Partnered Research Center for Quality Care. Methodological input and development are relevant to every aspect of the Center. Specific needs include measuring participation and markers of network capacity, tracking outcomes for diverse stakeholders, monitoring feedback from partners and communities that relate to the Center's capacity to support partnered research, and evaluating intervention implementation and outcomes. We seek to ensure that efforts to advance knowledge and to inform programs and policy decisions are based on rigorous science as well as to promote two-way capacity building so that partners gain access to methodological expertise and methodologists are responsive to community needs and contexts. We have structured Units for this Methods Core to provide necessary expertise in design and quantitative analysis, qualitative and mixed methods techniques, measures development and adaptation to diverse populations, and policy analysis. Like the Core as a whole, each Unit (Biostatistics, Qualitative/Mixed- Methods, Measurement, Policy) is co-led by academic and partner Center members. The Qualitative/Mixed-Methods Unit includes a component to provide Rapid-Response Capability to assess research opportunities on a time scale that will facilitate taking advantage of potential natural experiments. Because we anticipate that future community-based partnered research will occur within network contexts, we have proposed an R34 Methods Pilot that will develop a web-based networking tool that, in addition to enhancing our network-analysis capabilities for research purposes, can be expected to support efforts to enhance quality of care by strengthening agency networks, particularly in an area of need we have identified regarding: mental-health services for individuals with co-occurring (notably substance-use) disorders. Training of. students and emerging investigators remains a.central goal of the Methods Core, and our Policy Unit includes support for a newrinvestigator pilot study onutility assessment for cost-effectiveness analysis in community programs for severe mental illness. , Overall;we plan to provide high-quality biostatistical support for partnered research, sophisticated qualitative/mixed-methods support for intervention development and evaluation, expert-supported development and application of measures of quality and outcomes of care that are appropriate for diverse populations, and state-of-the-art application of policy-analysis insights both in specific domains of quality-ofcare research as well as in the review of all Center projects for policy relevance.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
5P30MH082760-05
Application #
8376110
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZMH1-ERB-B)
Project Start
Project End
2014-06-30
Budget Start
2012-07-01
Budget End
2013-06-30
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
2012
Total Cost
$267,781
Indirect Cost
$96,888
Name
University of California Los Angeles
Department
Type
DUNS #
092530369
City
Los Angeles
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
90095
Choi, Kristen R; Sherbourne, Cathy; Tang, Lingqi et al. (2018) A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Depression Collaborative Care: Subanalysis of Comorbid Anxiety. West J Nurs Res :193945918800333
Sherbourne, Cathy D; Aoki, Wayne; Belin, Thomas R et al. (2017) Comparative Effectiveness of Two Models of Depression Services Quality Improvement in Health and Community Sectors. Psychiatr Serv 68:1315-1320
Landry, Craig M; Jackson, Aurora P; Tang, Lingqi et al. (2017) The Effects of Collaborative Care Training on Case Managers' Perceived Depression-Related Services Delivery. Psychiatr Serv 68:123-130
Starks, Sarah L; Arns, Paul G; Padwa, Howard et al. (2017) System Transformation Under the California Mental Health Services Act: Implementation of Full-Service Partnerships in L.A. County. Psychiatr Serv 68:587-595
Ong, Michael K; Jones, Loretta; Aoki, Wayne et al. (2017) A Community-Partnered, Participatory, Cluster-Randomized Study of Depression Care Quality Improvement: Three-Year Outcomes. Psychiatr Serv 68:1262-1270
Miranda, Jeanne; Bromley, Elizabeth; Izquierdo, Adriana et al. (2017) Surviving Depression: Clinical Qualitative Analysis of Long-Term Survival for Ethnically Diverse, Depressed Patients. J Nerv Ment Dis 205:589-599
Nadeem, Erum; Waterman, Jill; Foster, Jared et al. (2017) Long-Term Effects of Pre-Placement Risk Factors on Children's Psychological Symptoms and Parenting Stress Among Families Adopting Children From Foster Care. J Emot Behav Disord 25:67-81
Santiago, Catherine DeCarlo; Fuller, Anne K; Lennon, Jaclyn M et al. (2016) Parent perspectives from participating in a family component for CBITS: Acceptability of a culturally informed school-based program. Psychol Trauma 8:325-33
Ngo, Victoria K; Sherbourne, Cathy; Chung, Bowen et al. (2016) Community Engagement Compared With Technical Assistance to Disseminate Depression Care Among Low-Income, Minority Women: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Study. Am J Public Health 106:1833-41
Cha, Biblia S; Lawrence, Rachel I; Bliss, Jesse C et al. (2016) The Road to Resilience: Insights on Training Community Coalitions in the Los Angeles County Community Disaster Resilience Project. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 10:812-821

Showing the most recent 10 out of 91 publications