In previous studies, we found that the immunoglobulin kappa gene 3' enhancer is controlled by a variety of transcription factors (PU.1, Pip, E47, c-jun, c-fos, ATF1, CREM, Sp1, BSAP, and YY1). These factors can bind the 3' enhancer in vitro and can control its activity in transient expression assays. How these factors control the developmental activity of the enhancer in vivo is unknown. Although in vivo footprinting studies have shown differences in enhancer occupancy at distinct developmental stages, the specific proteins responsible for these differences are unknown. We will use chromatin immunoprecipitation (CHIP) and DNA pull down assays to identify the specific proteins that bind to the 3' enhancer at defined stages of B cell development. We will also determine the role of BSAP in formation of a non-functional enhanceosome complex and will identify the factors needed for cooperative enhanceosome assembly. Three of the enhancer binding factors (PU.1. Pip, and E47) cooperate to produce powerful transcriptional synergy through PU.1-Pip and E47-Pip DNA binding elements. The mechanism of E47-Pip DNA binding will be approached by footprint, quantitative EMSA, and biosensor (Biocore) studies. We will use computer generated molecular models to guide studies on identifying amino acid residues needed for E47-Pip cooperative DNA binding and transcriptional synergy. We will also determine whether quantitative differences in Pip expression can activate the endogenous kappa gene in pre-B cells. Pip dominant negative mutants will be tested for ability to inhibit endogenous kappa gene expression in plasmacytoma cells. We will also use computer generated molecular models to guide mutagenesis efforts to examine the mechanism of cooperative PU.1-Pip DNA binding and transcriptional synergy. Finally, we will determine the function of specific PU.1 domains in vivo. We previously used biochemical, transient expression, and embryonic stem (ES) cell assays to identify PU.1 domains needed for transcription, protein recruitment to DNA, protein interaction, and macrophage development. We will use homologous recombination technology to prepare knock-in mice that express PU.1 mutants that ablate specific PU.1 functions. The effect of these specific PU.1 mutations on hematopoietic development, transcription, chromatin structure, enhanceosome formation, and somatic recombination will be assessed. These studies represent parallel in vitro and in vivo approaches to study gene regulation and cellular differentiation.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
2R01GM042415-12A1
Application #
6430322
Study Section
Cell Development and Function Integrated Review Group (CDF)
Program Officer
Tompkins, Laurie
Project Start
1989-07-01
Project End
2005-11-30
Budget Start
2001-12-01
Budget End
2002-11-30
Support Year
12
Fiscal Year
2002
Total Cost
$301,150
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Pennsylvania
Department
Veterinary Sciences
Type
Schools of Veterinary Medicine
DUNS #
042250712
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19104
Atchison, Michael L (2014) Function of YY1 in Long-Distance DNA Interactions. Front Immunol 5:45
Hodawadekar, Suchita; Yu, Duonan; Cozma, Diana et al. (2007) B-Lymphoma cells with epigenetic silencing of Pax5 trans-differentiate into macrophages, but not other hematopoietic lineages. Exp Cell Res 313:331-40
Hodawadekar, Suchita; Wei, Fang; Yu, Duonan et al. (2006) Epigenetic histone modifications do not control Igkappa locus contraction and intranuclear localization in cells with dual B cell-macrophage potential. J Immunol 177:6165-71
Wilkinson, Frank H; Park, Kyoungsook; Atchison, Michael L (2006) Polycomb recruitment to DNA in vivo by the YY1 REPO domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:19296-301
McDevit, Daniel C; Perkins, Leslie; Atchison, Michael L et al. (2005) The Ig kappa 3' enhancer is activated by gradients of chromatin accessibility and protein association. J Immunol 174:2834-42
Srinivasan, Lakshmi; Pan, Xuan; Atchison, Michael L (2005) Transient requirements of YY1 expression for PcG transcriptional repression and phenotypic rescue. J Cell Biochem 96:689-99
Bai, Yuchen; Srinivasan, Lakshmi; Perkins, Leslie et al. (2005) Protein acetylation regulates both PU.1 transactivation and Ig kappa 3' enhancer activity. J Immunol 175:5160-9
Joo, Myungsoo; Park, Gye Young; Wright, Jeffrey G et al. (2004) Transcriptional regulation of the cyclooxygenase-2 gene in macrophages by PU.1. J Biol Chem 279:6658-65
Srinivasan, Lakshmi; Atchison, Michael L (2004) YY1 DNA binding and PcG recruitment requires CtBP. Genes Dev 18:2596-601
Nagulapalli, Sujatha; Goheer, Aisha; Pitt, Leslie et al. (2002) Mechanism of e47-Pip interaction on DNA resulting in transcriptional synergy and activation of immunoglobulin germ line sterile transcripts. Mol Cell Biol 22:7337-50

Showing the most recent 10 out of 26 publications