This research will examine how """"""""molecular"""""""" (small-scale) variables affect choice behavior. One line of research will examine how individuals choose between a small immediate reinforcer and larger delayed reinforcer, and how the strength or value of a reinforcer declines with increasing delay. These experiments will test different mathematical models of the temporal discounting function. A second line of research will examine different variables that may modulate the effects of delay, including the sizes of the reinforcers involved, an individual's past experience with delayed reinforcers, the amount of effort committed, and the presence of signals that partition the delay interval into smaller segments. An adjusting-delay procedure will be used, in which the delay for one alternative is systematically increased and decreased over trials to find an indifference point-a delay at which the two alternatives are equally preferred. A third line of research will examine choice in more complex procedures called concurrent-chains schedules, which feature a choice period followed by a period in which the subject receives the consequences of its choices. These studies will be designed to test and compare the predictions of several current mathematical models of complex choice. The subjects will be pigeons and rats performing in standard operant conditioning chambers with food as a reinforcer. In some cases, parallel experiments will be conducted with the two species to test the generality of the findings. Many important everyday choices involve a conflict between an individual's short-term and long-term interests (such as the pleasures of smoking, drinking, or overeating versus future health, or the fun of a shopping spree versus saving for long-term financial security). The research described in this proposal is directed at developing a quantitative model for understanding how such choices are made, why individuals sometimes do and sometimes do not make choices that are in their best long-term interests, and what factors control these decisions.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01MH038357-24
Application #
7683925
Study Section
Biobehavioral Regulation, Learning and Ethology Study Section (BRLE)
Program Officer
Rossi, Andrew
Project Start
1992-09-15
Project End
2011-02-28
Budget Start
2009-09-01
Budget End
2011-02-28
Support Year
24
Fiscal Year
2009
Total Cost
$72,418
Indirect Cost
Name
Southern Connecticut State University
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
145900825
City
New Haven
State
CT
Country
United States
Zip Code
06515
Mazur, James E (2014) Rats' choices with token stimuli in concurrent variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav 102:198-212
Mazur, James E; Biondi, Dawn R (2013) Pigeons' choices with token stimuli in concurrent variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav 99:159-78
Mazur, James E (2012) Effects of pre-trial response requirements on self-control choices by rats and pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 97:215-30
Mazur, James E; Kahlbaugh, Patricia E (2012) Choice behavior of pigeons (Columba livia), college students, and preschool children (Homo sapiens) in the Monty Hall dilemma. J Comp Psychol 126:407-20
Mazur, James E; Biondi, Dawn R (2011) Effects of time between trials on rats' and pigeons' choices with probabilistic delayed reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav 95:41-56
Mazur, James E (2010) Distributed versus exclusive preference in discrete-trial choice. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 36:321-33
Mazur, James E; Biondi, Dawn R (2009) Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting. J Exp Anal Behav 91:197-211
Mazur, James E (2008) Effects of reinforcer delay and variability in a successive-encounters procedure. Learn Behav 36:301-10
Mazur, James E (2007) Choice in a successive-encounters procedure and hyperbolic decay of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 88:73-85
Mazur, James E (2007) Rats'choices between one and two delayed reinforcers. Learn Behav 35:169-76

Showing the most recent 10 out of 42 publications