Purpose: This is a randomized, double-blind study comparing the safety, patient acceptability and efficacy of RPR 109413 to a licensed IVIG product, Gamimune-N. Background: Intravenous gammaglobulin (IVIG) preparations have been tested in the US since 1975; ten have been licensed since 1981, seven of which are currently available. The efficacy of IVIG in preventing infections in patients with primary disorders of humoral immunity is well accepted, though it has never been subjected to a controlled double-blind study. A study comparing IVIG to placebo would be considered unethical, though it is possible to compare new products to those that have been licensed for use. In the past several years efforts have focused on developing products with increased safety, especially with regard to the risk of transmitting viral infections such as Hepatitis C. This study proposes to compare the safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of a new, heat-pasteurized IVIG preparation (RPR 109413) to a licensed preparation, Gamimune-N. RPR 109413 is a sterile, preservative-free, liquid preparation of unmodified human polyvalent immunoglobulins manufactured by Armour Division of Rhtne-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceutical. It is prepared from ISG made from a pool of at least 1000 donors. Donors are tested for HIV, HBsAg, Hepatitis C antibody, and increased levels of ALT before being accepted into the pool. The ISG is prepared by the same Cohn fractionation process used for all of the currently licensed products. The Cohn fraction III supernatant is subjected to a viral inactivation step consisting of treatment at 60 C. This treatment was shown to inactivate several surrogate viruses. It is not practical to test inactivation of Hepatitis C directly since the only test system is non-human primates, but these other viruses have been shown to have similar sensitivity to viruses known to be human pathogens. The IgG is adsorbed to reduce the concentration of isoagglutinins, polyethylene glycol is added to precipitate complexes, and the solution is dialyzed to remove the PEG and reduce the sodium concentration. Five percent mannitol is added to enhance stability. The final preparation is at least 98% IgG with trace amounts of IgA and IgM. The amount of IgA is estimated to be < 5 5g/ml, which is comparable to the other low IgA preparation, Gammagard. Methods: This is a randomized, double-blind study comparing the safety, patient acceptability and efficacy of RPR 109413 to a licensed IVIG product, Gamimune-N. It is a multicenter phase II study intended to enroll approximately 80 patients. Each center will enroll up to 10 patients. All patients have well characterized disorders of humoral immunity and require gammaglobulin infusions for infection prophylaxis. All patients have received at least six infusions of IVIG and are known to tolerate the currently available preparations. IgA deficient patients who are at risk for making anti-IgA antibodies will be excluded. Patients will come to the research ward for a screening visit within one month of entering the study. If they meet the entry requirements they will be entered to receive six infusions at the dose and frequency given during the three months preceding the study. They will receive either RPR 109413 or Gamimune-N which will be put in IV bags by the pharmacy so that neither the patient nor the investigators will know which preparation is used. The IVIG will be infused at an initial rate of 0.01 cc/kg/min and the rate increased to 0.02 then 0.04 and finally a maximum of 0.06 cc/kg/min at 15 minute intervals unless adverse reactions occur. These rates are standard for the infusion of IVIG and below those commonly used for infusions of non-investigational IVIG.

Project Start
1997-12-01
Project End
1998-11-30
Budget Start
1997-10-01
Budget End
1998-09-30
Support Year
37
Fiscal Year
1998
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Duke University
Department
Type
DUNS #
071723621
City
Durham
State
NC
Country
United States
Zip Code
27705
Askie, Lisa M; Darlow, Brian A; Finer, Neil et al. (2018) Association Between Oxygen Saturation Targeting and Death or Disability in Extremely Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration. JAMA 319:2190-2201
Srinivasan, Lakshmi; Page, Grier; Kirpalani, Haresh et al. (2017) Genome-wide association study of sepsis in extremely premature infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 102:F439-F445
Denson, Lee A; McDonald, Scott A; Das, Abhik et al. (2017) Early Elevation in Interleukin-6 is Associated with Reduced Growth in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants. Am J Perinatol 34:240-247
James, Jennifer; Munson, David; DeMauro, Sara B et al. (2017) Outcomes of Preterm Infants following Discussions about Withdrawal or Withholding of Life Support. J Pediatr 190:118-123.e4
Younge, Noelle; Goldstein, Ricki F; Bann, Carla M et al. (2017) Survival and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes among Periviable Infants. N Engl J Med 376:617-628
Archer, Stephanie Wilson; Carlo, Waldemar A; Truog, William E et al. (2016) Improving publication rates in a collaborative clinical trials research network. Semin Perinatol 40:410-417
Ahmed, Zuhayer; Prasad, Indrajit; Rahman, Hafizur et al. (2016) A Male with Extreme Subcutaneous Insulin Resistance: A Case Report. Rom J Diabetes Nutr Metab Dis 23:209-213
Phelps, Dale L; Ward, Robert M; Williams, Rick L et al. (2016) Safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple dose myo-inositol in preterm infants. Pediatr Res 80:209-17
Adams, Rebecca N; Mosher, Catherine E; Blair, Cindy K et al. (2015) Cancer survivors' uptake and adherence in diet and exercise intervention trials: an integrative data analysis. Cancer 121:77-83
Azrad, M; Vollmer, R T; Madden, J et al. (2015) Disparate results between proliferation rates of surgically excised prostate tumors and an in vitro bioassay using sera from a positive randomized controlled trial. Biotech Histochem 90:184-9

Showing the most recent 10 out of 128 publications