Project 4 ? Assessing the Overuse and Underuse of Diagnostic Testing Low-value health care ? care that provides little health benefit in light of its costs and risks to patients ? is a central concern for policy-makers. Diagnostic testing is a particularly important example: while the use of high- cost diagnostic tests has skyrocketed, for many the frequency with which the tests that are performed identify new diagnoses or trigger effective interventions appears low, while some patients with likely high benefit go untested. The challenge is to make an accurate prospective prediction of each patient?s likely benefit at the time the testing decision is made. To this end, we draw on recent advances in machine learning algorithms to predict which Medicare patients are likely to benefit from specific diagnostic tests: stress testing for myocardial infarction; CT pulmonary angiography for pulmonary embolism; and spine MRI to detect treatable causes of back pain. These tests seek to detect treatable medical conditions with important health implications, but involve substantial costs, and often risks to patients. Building on early evidence that machine learning algorithms combined with massive datasets can make highly accurate predictions, we will predict test value using data available to the doctor at the time the test is ordered. We can then assess the extent to which doctors are (a) testing patients with predictably low benefit, or (b) failing to test patients with predictably high benefit. We can also use this approach to better understand whether well-documented variations in testing across regions and providers are the result of provider behavior or underlying patient factors. We will then leverage this approach using electronic health record data. This will also allow us to assess the feasibility of translating our work into a decision support intervention that could be integrated into individual hospitals? electronic health record systems. With advances in medical technology and data science, there are new opportunities to better deploy health care resources to meet the health care needs of an aging population. By developing broadly applicable machine learning techniques for estimating risk in both Medicare claims and electronic health record data, this project will generate the tools and insights needed to help ensure that health care resources are devoted to patients likely to benefit the most from them.

Public Health Relevance

? RELEVANCE TO PUBLIC HEALTH Low-value health care ? care that provides little health benefit in light of its costs and risks to patients? is a central concern for policy-makers. By developing broadly applicable machine learning techniques for estimating risk in both Medicare claims and electronic health record data, this project will generate the tools and insights needed to help ensure that health care resources are devoted to patients likely to benefit the most from them.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01AG005842-32
Application #
9990666
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZAG1)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2020-07-01
Budget End
2021-06-30
Support Year
32
Fiscal Year
2020
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
National Bureau of Economic Research
Department
Type
DUNS #
054552435
City
Cambridge
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02138
Foverskov, Else; Glymour, M Maria; Mortensen, Erik L et al. (2018) Education and Cognitive Aging: Accounting for Selection and Confounding in Linkage of Data From the Danish Registry and Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Am J Epidemiol 187:2423-2430
Ho, Kate; Pakes, Ariel; Shepard, Mark (2018) The Evolution of Health Insurer Costs in Massachusetts, 2010-12. Rev Ind Organ 53:117-137
Abeliansky, Ana Lucia; Strulik, Holger (2018) How We Fall Apart: Similarities of Human Aging in 10 European Countries. Demography 55:341-359
Lübs, Lena; Peplies, Jenny; Drell, Carina et al. (2018) Cross-sectional and longitudinal factors influencing physical activity of 65 to 75-year-olds: a pan European cohort study based on the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). BMC Geriatr 18:94
Heger, Dörte; Korfhage, Thorben (2018) Care choices in Europe: To Each According to His or Her Needs? Inquiry 55:46958018780848
Dobkin, Carlos; Finkelstein, Amy; Kluender, Raymond et al. (2018) The Economic Consequences of Hospital Admissions. Am Econ Rev 102:308-352
Solé-Auró, Aïda; Jasilionis, Domantas; Li, Peng et al. (2018) Do women in Europe live longer and happier lives than men? Eur J Public Health 28:847-852
Baicker, Katherine (2018) Driving Better Health Policy: ""It's the Evidence, Stupid"": Uwe Reinhardt Memorial Lecture. Health Serv Res 53:4055-4063
Deaton, Angus (2018) What do self-reports of wellbeing say about life-cycle theory and policy? J Public Econ 162:18-25
Lourenco, Joana; Serrano, Antonio; Santos-Silva, Alice et al. (2018) Cardiovascular Risk Factors Are Correlated with Low Cognitive Function among Older Adults Across Europe Based on The SHARE Database. Aging Dis 9:90-101

Showing the most recent 10 out of 403 publications