Much evidence suggests that the anti- tumor immune response contributes significantly to the therapeutic efficacy of bone marrow transplantation in the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies. In fact, the reduced relapse rates observed in the setting of allogeneic transplantation when compared to other treatment modalities is likely the result of immune mediated """"""""graft-versus-tumor"""""""" effects. Unfortunately, because of the lack of tumor-specificity of the allo-response, what is gained by a reduction in relapse rates is lost in the morbidity and mortality of graft versus host disease and its treatment. In contrast, autologous transplantation has a relatively favorable safety profile, while preserving the benefit of chemo/radiation used at dosed beyond what can be given without stem cell support. Accordingly, effects to augment anti-tumor immunity during autologous transplantation may provide means to diminish relapse rates without concomitant increase toxicity. In mouse models, a measurable graft-versus-tumor effect can upon T-cell recognition of tumor- associated antigens, rather than host minor antigens . However, this response is rapidly extinguished in the post transplant period in association with tumor progression. In contrast, vaccination during the period of immune reconstitution with irradiated autologous tumor cells plus a paracrine source of GM-CSF sustains this response, which closely correlates with freedom from relapse. Furthermore, immunization prior to the collection of the graft results in significant adoptive transfer of anti-tumor immunity to the tumor- bearing transplant recipient. Therefore, the overall objective of this proposal is to enhance the anti-tumor immune response in the setting of autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation through the successful integration of tumor-specific vaccination and adoptive immunotherapy.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
2P01CA015396-27A2
Application #
6472761
Study Section
Project Start
1976-09-30
Project End
2006-02-28
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
27
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
$225,914
Indirect Cost
Name
Johns Hopkins University
Department
Type
DUNS #
045911138
City
Baltimore
State
MD
Country
United States
Zip Code
21218
Schoch, Laura K; Cooke, Kenneth R; Wagner-Johnston, Nina D et al. (2018) Immune checkpoint inhibitors as a bridge to allogeneic transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide. Blood Adv 2:2226-2229
Kasamon, Yvette L; Fuchs, Ephraim J; Zahurak, Marianna et al. (2018) Shortened-Duration Tacrolimus after Nonmyeloablative, HLA-Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 24:1022-1028
Robinson, Tara M; Prince, Gabrielle T; Thoburn, Chris et al. (2018) Pilot trial of K562/GM-CSF whole-cell vaccination in MDS patients. Leuk Lymphoma 59:2801-2811
Grant, Melanie L; Bollard, Catherine M (2018) Cell therapies for hematological malignancies: don't forget non-gene-modified t cells! Blood Rev 32:203-224
Gladstone, D E; Petri, M; BolaƱos-Meade, J et al. (2017) Long-term systemic lupus erythematosus disease control after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Lupus 26:773-776
Ghosh, Nilanjan; Ye, Xiaobu; Tsai, Hua-Ling et al. (2017) Allogeneic Blood or Marrow Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Multiple Myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 23:1903-1909
Majzner, Robbie G; Mogri, Huzefa; Varadhan, Ravi et al. (2017) Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide after Bone Marrow Transplantation Is Not Associated with an Increased Risk of Donor-Derived Malignancy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 23:612-617
Alonso, Salvador; Jones, Richard J; Ghiaur, Gabriel (2017) Retinoic acid, CYP26, and drug resistance in the stem cell niche. Exp Hematol 54:17-25
Cruz, Conrad R Y; Bollard, Catherine M (2017) Adoptive Immunotherapy For Leukemia With Ex vivo Expanded T Cells. Curr Drug Targets 18:271-280
Fuchs, Ephraim Joseph (2017) Related haploidentical donors are a better choice than matched unrelated donors: Point. Blood Adv 1:397-400

Showing the most recent 10 out of 456 publications