Combination estrogen-progestogen therapy for postmenopausal women has become increasingly popular since the mid-1970s. Early on, clinicians widely believed that, in addition to reducing the risk of endometrial cancer associated with unopposed estrogen therapy, such therapy would reduce the risk of breast cancer. It was assumed that progestogens had an """"""""anti-estrogen"""""""" effect on breast tissue comparable to that on the endometrium, with the results of a large prospective study of women receiving various modes of therapy widely quoted as supporting this view. However, the finding of an increased risk of breast cancer associated with combination oral contraceptive therapy given around the time of menopause and the observation that breast tissue mitotic activity peaks during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle suggest estrogen-progestogen therapy may actually increase breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Experimental data support this notion, as does suggestive but inadequate data on use of progestogen-only contraceptives. One prospective epidemiologic study of combination therapy and breast cancer also suggests an increased risk but the number of cases was small. To determine the effect on breast cancer risk of combination estrogen-progestogen hormonal replacement therapy as well as of unopposed estrogen replacement therapy, we have been conducting a large case-control study. Preliminary analysis from 1355 cases and 884 controls indicate that unopposed estrogen therapy moderately increases breast cancer risk overall, but in a duration and dose-related fashion. The addition of a progestogen appears to enhance these estrogen-related effects and leads to a further increase in breast cancer risk. We wish to expand this study to address more adequately duration and latency effects, the possible interaction between use of hormone replacement therapy and other breast cancer risk factors, and to confidently assess differences in risk levels with use of combination versus unopposed replacement therapy. Breast cancer patients are English- or Spanish-speaking women aged 55 and over, of all races except Asian, born in 1923 or later, and identified by our population-based tumor registry over a six year period. Controls are individually matched to cases by age (+3 years), race and neighborhood of residence. A structured interview form supplemented by a comprehensive manual containing color photographs of all types of estrogen and progestogen pills is employed for the in-person interviews. Validation of hormone therapy is accomplished by a review of physician records. The 3000 case-control pairs to be interviewed will allow for the evaluation of the effects of estrogen and estrogen- progestogen therapy on breast cancer risk in the presence of possible confounding variables, such as age at and type of menopause and weight, and for testing for interactions between hormone therapy and other breast cancer risk factors, such as benign breast disease, and for careful evaluation of the effects of duration and latency.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01CA017054-21S1
Application #
6236365
Study Section
Project Start
1996-04-01
Project End
1999-03-31
Budget Start
1996-10-01
Budget End
1997-09-30
Support Year
21
Fiscal Year
1997
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Southern California
Department
Type
DUNS #
041544081
City
Los Angeles
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
90089
Ma, Huiyan; Ursin, Giske; Xu, Xinxin et al. (2018) Body mass index at age 18 years and recent body mass index in relation to risk of breast cancer overall and ER/PR/HER2-defined subtypes in white women and African-American women: a pooled analysis. Breast Cancer Res 20:5
Liu, Gang; Mukherjee, Bhramar; Lee, Seunggeun et al. (2018) Robust Tests for Additive Gene-Environment Interaction in Case-Control Studies Using Gene-Environment Independence. Am J Epidemiol 187:366-377
Ong, Jue-Sheng; Hwang, Liang-Dar; Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel et al. (2018) Assessment of moderate coffee consumption and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study. Int J Epidemiol 47:450-459
Harris, Holly R; Babic, Ana; Webb, Penelope M et al. (2018) Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Oligomenorrhea, and Risk of Ovarian Cancer Histotypes: Evidence from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 27:174-182
Lu, Yingchang; Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia; Wu, Lang et al. (2018) A Transcriptome-Wide Association Study Among 97,898 Women to Identify Candidate Susceptibility Genes for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk. Cancer Res 78:5419-5430
Peres, Lauren C; Risch, Harvey; Terry, Kathryn L et al. (2018) Racial/ethnic differences in the epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies. Int J Epidemiol 47:460-472
Lee, Eunjung; Luo, Jianning; Schumacher, Fredrick R et al. (2018) Growth factor genes and change in mammographic density after stopping combined hormone therapy in the California Teachers Study. BMC Cancer 18:1072
Zhong, Charlie; Cockburn, Myles; Cozen, Wendy et al. (2017) Evaluating the use of friend or family controls in epidemiologic case-control studies. Cancer Epidemiol 46:9-13
Praestegaard, Camilla; Jensen, Allan; Jensen, Signe M et al. (2017) Cigarette smoking is associated with adverse survival among women with ovarian cancer: Results from a pooled analysis of 19 studies. Int J Cancer 140:2422-2435
Reid, Brett M; Permuth, Jennifer B; Chen, Y Ann et al. (2017) Integration of Population-Level Genotype Data with Functional Annotation Reveals Over-Representation of Long Noncoding RNAs at Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Loci. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 26:116-125

Showing the most recent 10 out of 324 publications