The Evaluation Shared Resource (ESR) consists of units in Field Services and Quality Control, Database Management and Statistics, and Cost Analysis. Its purpose is to provide an efficient, centralized service facility for scientific and technical support to program project (P01) investigators. These units will provide the following services: The Field Services and Quality Control Unit assists investigators with sampling, conducts pre- and pilot tests, manages interviewer staff, edits and codes data collection instruments, and prepares project field documentation files. The Database Management and Statistics Unit works with investigators and staff to provide data entry, systems analysis, programming, database management, and archiving support, supports data analysis programs, and provides statistical support to developmental research initiatives. The Cost Analysis Unit works with investigators to evaluate the costs of competing research design strategies, develops cost functions and data collection procedures, and evaluates cost-effectiveness of promising interventions. The ESR provides a structure for efficient administration and a cohesive approach to the entire range of services that the proposed research requires, and maximizes the benefit of shared experience to current and future research projects.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01CA034847-14
Application #
6102168
Study Section
Project Start
1998-04-16
Project End
2001-03-31
Budget Start
1997-10-01
Budget End
1998-09-30
Support Year
14
Fiscal Year
1998
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Department
Type
DUNS #
075524595
City
Seattle
State
WA
Country
United States
Zip Code
98109
Satia, Jessie A; Kristal, Alan R; Patterson, Ruth E et al. (2002) Psychosocial factors and dietary habits associated with vegetable consumption. Nutrition 18:247-54
Levy, L; Patterson, R E; Kristal, A R et al. (2000) How well do consumers understand percentage daily value on food labels? Am J Health Promot 14:157-60, ii
Peterson Jr, A V; Kealey, K A; Mann, S L et al. (2000) Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project: long-term randomized trial in school-based tobacco use prevention--results on smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1979-91
Satia, J A; Patterson, R E; Taylor, V M et al. (2000) Use of qualitative methods to study diet, acculturation, and health in Chinese-American women. J Am Diet Assoc 100:934-40
Neuhouser, M L; Kristal, A R; Patterson, R E (1999) Use of food nutrition labels is associated with lower fat intake. J Am Diet Assoc 99:45-53
Patterson, R E; Levy, L; Tinker, L F et al. (1999) Evaluation of a simplified vitamin supplement inventory developed for the Women's Health Initiative. Public Health Nutr 2:273-6
Kristal, A R; Glanz, K; Curry, S J et al. (1999) How can stages of change be best used in dietary interventions? J Am Diet Assoc 99:679-84
Neuhouser, M L; Patterson, R E; Levy, L (1999) Motivations for using vitamin and mineral supplements. J Am Diet Assoc 99:851-4
Patterson, R E; Kristal, A R; Levy, L et al. (1998) Validity of methods used to assess vitamin and mineral supplement use. Am J Epidemiol 148:643-9
Patterson, R E; Kristal, A R; Shannon, J et al. (1997) Using a brief household food inventory as an environmental indicator of individual dietary practices. Am J Public Health 87:272-5

Showing the most recent 10 out of 15 publications