This project, Project 3 of the BSPP, will determine the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the interventions developed and implemented in Projects 1 and 2. Three outcomes will be examined to determine the cost- effectiveness and cost-utility of the programs implemented in Lee County, Florida, compared to the full measurement control counties - Indian River, St Lucie and Marin, Florida: participation rates for breast cancer screening; life-years gained; and quality adjusted life-years gained. Participation rates for breast screening will be obtained from Project 1. Breast cancer incidence and stage will be obtained from the Florida Tumor Registry though the Biometry Core. The costs of implementing and maintaining the intervention programs will be obtained from the Administrative and Community Cores. The costs of screening and the costs induced by screening, for evaluation, treatment, follow-up and terminal care of breast cancer, for death from other causes, and for lost time, will be obtained prospectively for randomly selected women with breast cancer and with benign breast disease in the intervention county and the full measurement comparison counties. Quality of life will be measured for women with breast cancer and women with benign breast disease using Kaplan's Quality of Well-Being instrument Sensitivity analyses will examine program development and implementation costs, and the effect of a range of discount rates, estimates of life expectancy, utility values, costs for screening procedures, and costs induced by screening. The costs and effects of Project 2 will also be examined as part of the sensitivity analysis.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01CA046456-06
Application #
3730810
Study Section
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
6
Fiscal Year
1995
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Vermont & St Agric College
Department
Type
DUNS #
066811191
City
Burlington
State
VT
Country
United States
Zip Code
05405
Danigelis, Nicholas L; Worden, John K; Flynn, Brian S et al. (2005) Increasing mammography screening among low-income African American women with limited access to health information. Prev Med 40:880-7
Vacek, Pamela M; Winstead-Fry, Patricia; Secker-Walker, Roger H et al. (2003) Factors influencing quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 12:527-37
Worden, John K; Mickey, Ruth M; Vacek, Pamela M et al. (2002) Evaluation of a community breast screening promotion program. Prev Med 35:349-61
Danigelis, N L; Ashley, J A; Worden, J K et al. (2001) Two community outreach strategies to increase breast cancer screening among low-income women. J Cancer Educ 16:55-8
Secker-Walker, R H; Vacek, P M; Hooper, G J et al. (1999) Screening for breast cancer: time, travel, and out-of-pocket expenses. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:702-8
Holland, R R; Ellis, C A; Geller, B M et al. (1999) Life expectancy estimation with breast cancer: bias of the declining exponential function and an alternative to its use. Med Decis Making 19:385-93
Worden, J K; Solomon, L J; Flynn, B S et al. (1999) Community-based promotion of breast screening using small group education. J Public Health Manag Pract 5:54-62
Solomon, L J; Mickey, R M; Rairikar, C J et al. (1998) Three-year prospective adherence to three breast cancer screening modalities. Prev Med 27:781-6
Solomon, L J; Flynn, B S; Worden, J K et al. (1998) Assessment of self-reward strategies for maintenance of breast self-examination. J Behav Med 21:83-102
Vacek, P M; Mickey, R M; Worden, J K (1997) Reliability of self-reported breast screening information in a survey of lower income women. Prev Med 26:287-91

Showing the most recent 10 out of 20 publications