The Program Project """"""""Risk-Based Breast Cancer Screening in Community Settings"""""""" is a large undertaking involving three research projects, three cores, seven participating breast imaging registries, an advisory board, several governance committees, and various institutional and community partners. The program's success will require extensive coordination and communication among the various components. Core A, the Administrative Core, will be the operational backbone of this program, assisting all projects in achieving their objectives and collaborating with the other cores to ensure that the program functions efficiently and productively. This will include supporting logistic and financial requirements, developing effective communication strategies for collecting data and disseminating research findings, and creating mechanisms to encourage and facilitate data sharing with non-program investigators. The Administrative Core will also conduct an annual evaluation of the Program Project that assesses the performance and effectiveness of each research project and core, as well as examining the extent of collaboration, quality of communication, and scientific productivity across the entire program. The design of this core is based on our 16 years of experience working with the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) and its associated ancillary studies.
Its specific aims are to provide centralized support for the program, particularly in logistic and financial requirements;assist project and core leaders in communication, especially disseminating research findings internally and externally;facilitating collaboration with non-program investigators by maintaining and refining mechanisms to support sharing program data;and evaluating and improving program performance through annual evaluations.

Public Health Relevance

The Administrative Core will provide operational structure to the program, providing overall administrative support, fiscal oversight, and administrative assistance to all projects and cores. The core will plan program meetings, generate progress reports for the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and oversee budgets. It will standardize and facilitate communication, provide leadership on confidentiality issues, coordinate dissemination of research findings, and evaluate program progress.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01CA154292-04
Application #
8734254
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-GRB-S)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2014-09-01
Budget End
2015-08-31
Support Year
4
Fiscal Year
2014
Total Cost
$207,737
Indirect Cost
$28,526
Name
Group Health Cooperative
Department
Type
DUNS #
078198520
City
Seattle
State
WA
Country
United States
Zip Code
98101
Lee, Janie M; Abraham, Linn; Lam, Diana L et al. (2018) Cumulative Risk Distribution for Interval Invasive Second Breast Cancers After Negative Surveillance Mammography. J Clin Oncol 36:2070-2077
van den Broek, Jeroen J; van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S et al. (2018) Comparing CISNET Breast Cancer Models Using the Maximum Clinical Incidence Reduction Methodology. Med Decis Making 38:112S-125S
Puvanesarajah, Samantha; Nyante, Sarah J; Kuzmiak, Cherie M et al. (2018) PAM50 and Risk of Recurrence Scores for Interval Breast Cancers. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 11:327-336
Mandelblatt, Jeanne S; Near, Aimee M; Miglioretti, Diana L et al. (2018) Common Model Inputs Used in CISNET Collaborative Breast Cancer Modeling. Med Decis Making 38:9S-23S
Dabbous, Firas; Dolecek, Therese A; Friedewald, Sarah M et al. (2018) Performance characteristics of digital vs film screen mammography in community practice. Breast J 24:369-372
Alagoz, Oguzhan; Ergun, Mehmet Ali; Cevik, Mucahit et al. (2018) The University of Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model: An Update. Med Decis Making 38:99S-111S
Rice, Megan S; Tamimi, Rulla M; Bertrand, Kimberly A et al. (2018) Does mammographic density mediate risk factor associations with breast cancer? An analysis by tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat 170:129-141
Ray, Kimberly M; Kerlikowske, Karla; Lobach, Iryna V et al. (2018) Effect of Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MR Imaging Interpretive Performance in Community-based Practices. Radiology 286:822-829
He, Xiaofei; Schifferdecker, Karen E; Ozanne, Elissa M et al. (2018) How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med 33:1905-1912
Onega, T; Zhu, W; Weiss, J E et al. (2018) Preoperative breast MRI and mortality in older women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 170:149-157

Showing the most recent 10 out of 190 publications