Addicts have great difficulty resisting stimuli (cues) that have been associated with drug use. Such cues unduly attract their attention, draw them to locations where drugs are located and motivate continued drug seeking behavior - often leading to relapse even in the face of an expressed desire to discontinue drug use. Drug cues are thought to acquire incentive motivational properties (""""""""incentive salience"""""""") as a consequence of Pavlovian conditioning, whereby previously neutral stimuli acquire conditional stimulus (CS) properties. However, in preclinical studies using rats we have discovered that individuals vary markedly in the extent to which they attribute incentive salience to reward cues. A reward cue may act as a perfectly effective CS, evoking a conditional response (CR) in all animals, but function as a potent incentive stimulus only in some. Only if reward cues act as incentive stimuli do they come to attract, incite, provoke, spur and motivate, leading to potentially maladaptive behavior. We hypothesize, therefore, that individuals prone to attribute incentive salience to reward cues will have particular difficulty resisting them and will be especially vulnerable to develop addiction-like behavior. We propose a series of preclinical studies using rats to test this hypothesis, and to determine the relationship between this """"""""trait"""""""", and others thought to confer vulnerability to addiction, including a propensity to make """"""""impulsive actions'. Specific studies address the following key questions: (1) Is it possible to predict, prior to any drug experience, which individuals will attribute incentive salience to a drug cue? (2) Does variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues predict which individuals are susceptible to develop addiction-like behavior when they are given extended opportunity to self-administer drugs? (3) Does past experience with drugs increase the degree to which incentive value is attributed to drug cues? (4) Do the brain regions necessary for Pavlovian stimulus-reward learning differ in animals that do or do not attribute incentive salience to reward cues? These studies have the potential to fundamentally shift how we think about individual vulnerability to addiction, and point the way for better-targeted interventions.

Public Health Relevance

Addiction is a major public health problem in the United States. The goal of this Project is to use a preclinical model to delineate the psychological and neurobiological basis of individual differences in vulnerability to develop addiction-like behavior, as this will help identify risk factors that will aid in the development of targeting interventions and treatments.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01DA031656-03
Application #
8638913
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-IFCN-H)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2014-04-01
Budget End
2015-03-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2014
Total Cost
$270,216
Indirect Cost
$96,444
Name
University of Michigan Ann Arbor
Department
Type
DUNS #
073133571
City
Ann Arbor
State
MI
Country
United States
Zip Code
48109
Ahrens, Allison M; Ferguson, Lindsay M; Robinson, Terry E et al. (2018) Dynamic Encoding of Incentive Salience in the Ventral Pallidum: Dependence on the Form of the Reward Cue. eNeuro 5:
Sarter, Martin; Phillips, Kyra B (2018) The neuroscience of cognitive-motivational styles: Sign- and goal-trackers as animal models. Behav Neurosci 132:1-12
Kawa, Alex B; Robinson, Terry E (2018) Sex differences in incentive-sensitization produced by intermittent access cocaine self-administration. Psychopharmacology (Berl) :
Singer, Bryan F; Fadanelli, Monica; Kawa, Alex B et al. (2018) Are Cocaine-Seeking ""Habits"" Necessary for the Development of Addiction-Like Behavior in Rats? J Neurosci 38:60-73
Mabrouk, Omar S; Han, John L; Wong, Jenny-Marie T et al. (2018) The in Vivo Neurochemical Profile of Selectively Bred High-Responder and Low-Responder Rats Reveals Baseline, Cocaine-Evoked, and Novelty-Evoked Differences in Monoaminergic Systems. ACS Chem Neurosci 9:715-724
Cogan, Elizabeth S; Shapses, Mark A; Robinson, Terry E et al. (2018) Disrupting reconsolidation: memory erasure or blunting of emotional/motivational value? Neuropsychopharmacology :
Pitchers, Kyle K; Phillips, Kyra B; Jones, Jonte L et al. (2017) Diverse Roads to Relapse: A Discriminative Cue Signaling Cocaine Availability Is More Effective in Renewing Cocaine Seeking in Goal Trackers Than Sign Trackers and Depends on Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Activity. J Neurosci 37:7198-7208
Turner, Cortney A; Flagel, Shelly B; Blandino Jr, Peter et al. (2017) Utilizing a unique animal model to better understand human temperament. Curr Opin Behav Sci 14:108-114
Pitchers, Kyle K; Wood, Taylor R; Skrzynski, Cari J et al. (2017) The ability for cocaine and cocaine-associated cues to compete for attention. Behav Brain Res 320:302-315
Flagel, Shelly B; Robinson, Terry E (2017) Neurobiological Basis of Individual Variation in Stimulus-Reward Learning. Curr Opin Behav Sci 13:178-185

Showing the most recent 10 out of 48 publications