The goal of the program project is the development of a new program for automated structure determination by X-ray crystallography. As with any new program extensive computing resources are required to facilitate development and testing. Therefore, a crystallized computing core will be located at LBNL. This core facility will be accessible via the Internet for all participating projects. In order that the computing core is used efficiently, a scientific programmer will initially be responsible for hardware installation and maintenance. This person will also assist the other Project members in code development and the application of parallelism to specific algorithms. Once the computing core hardware has become mature, and the needs of the individual Projects evolve, this scientific programmer will be replaced by a postdoctoral fellow. This person will be responsible for hardware maintenance and the development of new algorithms. In addition to providing a platform for code development and testing, the computing core will provide a resource for crystallographers. Remote access will be provided to crystallographers solving structures as part of structural genomics programs, at the Advanced Light Source (LBNL), the Advanced Photon Source (ANL), the National Synchrotron Light Source (Brookhaven), and Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (Stanford). These users will be able to use the latest versions of the PHENIX system to solve structures while they are still at the experimental station. This will facilitate the rapid solution of new structure and also provide valuable feedback to the PHENIX software developers.
Richardson, Jane S; Williams, Christopher J; Hintze, Bradley J et al. (2018) Model validation: local diagnosis, correction and when to quit. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 74:132-142 |
Herzik Jr, Mark A; Fraser, James S; Lander, Gabriel C (2018) A Multi-model Approach to Assessing Local and Global Cryo-EM Map Quality. Structure : |
Kryshtafovych, Andriy; Monastyrskyy, Bohdan; Adams, Paul D et al. (2018) Distribution of evaluation scores for the models submitted to the second cryo-EM model challenge. Data Brief 20:1629-1638 |
Moriarty, Nigel W; Liebschner, Dorothee; Klei, Herbert E et al. (2018) Interactive comparison and remediation of collections of macromolecular structures. Protein Sci 27:182-194 |
Kryshtafovych, Andriy; Adams, Paul D; Lawson, Catherine L et al. (2018) Evaluation system and web infrastructure for the second cryo-EM model challenge. J Struct Biol 204:96-108 |
Terwilliger, Thomas C; Adams, Paul D; Afonine, Pavel V et al. (2018) Map segmentation, automated model-building and their application to the Cryo-EM Model Challenge. J Struct Biol 204:338-343 |
Williams, Christopher J; Headd, Jeffrey J; Moriarty, Nigel W et al. (2018) MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci 27:293-315 |
Terwilliger, Thomas C; Adams, Paul D; Afonine, Pavel V et al. (2018) A fully automatic method yielding initial models from high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy maps. Nat Methods 15:905-908 |
Richardson, Jane S; Williams, Christopher J; Videau, Lizbeth L et al. (2018) Assessment of detailed conformations suggests strategies for improving cryoEM models: Helix at lower resolution, ensembles, pre-refinement fixups, and validation at multi-residue length scale. J Struct Biol 204:301-312 |
Hintze, Bradley J; Richardson, Jane S; Richardson, David C (2017) Mismodeled purines: implicit alternates and hidden Hoogsteens. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 73:852-859 |
Showing the most recent 10 out of 136 publications