This project applies stimulus control technology to fundamental problems in teaching individuals with severe learning difficulties to relate words and referents to graphic symbols for use in selection-based communication (SBC) systems. The overall goal is to develop effective, efficient methods for assessing and teaching relations among such stimuli, leading to the development of stimulus equivalence classes. We view these efforts as supporting ongoing applied research in SBC training for difficult-to-teach individuals. Positive outcomes will have theoretical implications as well: They will provide the first demonstration of stimulus equivalence in frankly nonverbal humans. Our study sample comprises students with severe learning difficulties who lack both functional vocal speech and the fine motor and imitation skills necessary to learn manual signing, but who could learn to communicate by selecting graphic symbols to indicate choices, needs, comments, and questions. Intervention studies have shown that SBC systems (i.e., communication books, boards, and electronic devices) can function as effective communication output modes as well as teaching tools for many individuals with mental retardation and autism. Those with the most severe learning difficulties, however, often do not respond to efforts to teach them by conventional methods that symbols and words can substitute for referents. Project 6 takes a relational learning approach to this critical problem. Project 6 will take advantage of technological developments to study several procedures for teaching relations among symbols, referents, and spoken words. Our studies use laboratory-validated stimulus control procedures such as match-to-sample (MTS) with exclusion and stimulus control shaping to teach relations among stimuli that constitute functional SBC vocabulary items. These procedures are combined with technological innovations to enable rich computer simulations of rudimentary SBC training. Techniques to be explored here include computerized presentations of: (1) high-quality motion video, animation, and scanned photographs; (2) recorded human speech. We will also evaluate transfer from structured training situations to use of symbols for recorded human speech. We will also evaluate transfer from structured training situations to use of symbols for communication in less structured, everyday situations.
Specific Aims of Project 6 are to: (1) assess the discriminability of sets of stimuli that are commonly used in SBC systems; (2) analyze the entering symbol matching repertoires of our samples of individuals with severe learning difficulties; (3) investigate methods for teaching relations between symbols and referents that minimize the probability of errors occurring in training, and result in functional substitutability of symbols for referents. (4) examine the function of synthetic speech output in the initial development of spoken word/symbol/referent relations; (5) explore techniques for developing new spoken word/symbol relations rapidly; (6) apply stimulus equivalence analyses to the expansion of stimulus equivalence classes for users of SBC systems; and (7) examine the relationship between language comprehension and acquisition of rudimentary SBC skills.

Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
7
Fiscal Year
1995
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center Mtl Retardatn
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
Waltham
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02254
McIlvane, William J; Kledaras, Joanne B; Gerard, Christophe J et al. (2018) Algorithmic analysis of relational learning processes in instructional technology: Some implications for basic, translational, and applied research. Behav Processes 152:18-25
Dube, William V; Farber, Rachel S; Mueller, Marlana R et al. (2016) Stimulus Overselectivity in Autism, Down Syndrome, and Typical Development. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil 121:219-35
McIlvane, W J; Gerard, C J; Kledaras, J B et al. (2016) Teaching Stimulus-Stimulus Relations to Minimally Verbal Individuals: Reflections on Technology and Future Directions. Eur J Behav Anal 17:49-68
Morro, Greg; Mackay, Harry A; Carlin, Michael T (2014) Rapid Teaching of Arbitrary Matching in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities. Psychol Rec 64:731-742
Wilkinson, Krista M; O'Neill, Tara; McIlvane, William J (2014) Eye-tracking measures reveal how changes in the design of aided AAC displays influence the efficiency of locating symbols by school-age children without disabilities. J Speech Lang Hear Res 57:455-66
Dube, William V; Wilkinson, Krista M (2014) The potential influence of stimulus overselectivity in AAC: information from eye tracking and behavioral studies of attention with individuals with intellectual disabilities. Augment Altern Commun 30:172-85
Wilkinson, Krista M; Mitchell, Teresa (2014) Eye tracking research to answer questions about augmentative and alternative communication assessment and intervention. Augment Altern Commun 30:106-19
Grisante, Priscila C; Galesi, Fernanda L; Sabino, NathalĂ­ M et al. (2013) Go/No-Go Procedure with Compound Stimuli: Effects of Training Structure On the Emergence of Equivalence Classes. Psychol Rec 63:63
Wilkinson, Krista M; McIlvane, William J (2013) Perceptual factors influence visual search for meaningful symbols in individuals with intellectual disabilities and Down syndrome or autism spectrum disorders. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil 118:353-64
McIlvane, William J; Kledaras, Joanne B (2012) Some Things We Learned from Sidman and Some We Did Not (We Think). Eur J Behav Anal 13:97-109

Showing the most recent 10 out of 32 publications