The organizational framework in Figure 1 reflects the centrality of the Administrative Core in coordinating the activities of both the Data Collection Core (B) and the Data Management and Statistical Core (C) units in serving the needs of the three individual projects. The Administrative Core will be responsible for the overall operation and coordination of the entire program project. Specifically, the Administrative Core will have direct oversight of the two other core units. The Data Collection Core (B) is the largest part of the program project.and will be responsible for retention of families; hiring, training, and supervision of the staff for data collection, and the execution of the data collection effort for all three projects (See description of Core B for more information). The Administrative Core will work very closely with the Data Collection Core to make sure that the implementation of data collection is done well. The Administrative Core will also make sure that the Data Collection Core works carefully with the Data Management and Statistical Core (see description of Core C for more information) to make sure the data are collected and recorded in a way that makes data entry easy and valid. The Data Management and Statistical Core will be responsible for data entry for all the projects and will be responsible for all data analysis. The Administrative Core will help coordinate how the Data Management and Statistical Core works closely with individual projects to make sure all measures are reliable and that data entry and analysis are done well and in a timely manner. The Administrative Core will also coordinate activities with the individual projects to make sure they deliver information needed to the data collection core and the data management and statistical core and their needs are served by all three core units. The National Scientific Advisory Board will serve to ensure that the work of the Program Project is consistent with the highest standards of science. The board will meet in the first and third year of the project. The National Scientific Advisory Board membership represents a wide range of expertise across a number of different disciplines. Members have extensive expertise in the areas of interest in this program project. The National Scientific Advisory Board will evaluate the Program Project Administration and its progress toward the goals outlined in this application. They will evaluate the work in progress and offer recommendations, for changes to strengthen the Program Project. The National Scientific Advisory Board members will be sent written material prior to the meeting that will include for the first year meeting: a copy of the application, materials that describe the procedures that have been developed for the administration of the project, protocol materials, and piloting reports. In the third year the board will evaluate the progress of the overall effort and t each component. They will be asked to provide oral and written feedback on the Project's progress at its midpoint. They will also be in positions to help with dissemination efforts and with policy implications.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01HD039667-09
Application #
8109381
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZHD1)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2010-07-01
Budget End
2011-06-30
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
2010
Total Cost
$455,330
Indirect Cost
Name
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Department
Type
DUNS #
608195277
City
Chapel Hill
State
NC
Country
United States
Zip Code
27599
Gatzke-Kopp, Lisa M; Ram, Nilam; Lydon-Staley, David M et al. (2018) Children's Sensitivity to Cost and Reward in Decision Making Across Distinct Domains of Probability, Effort, and Delay. J Behav Decis Mak 31:12-24
Daneri, M Paula; Blair, Clancy; Kuhn, Laura J et al. (2018) Maternal Language and Child Vocabulary Mediate Relations Between Socioeconomic Status and Executive Function During Early Childhood. Child Dev :
Zvara, Bharathi J; Macfie, Jenny; Cox, Martha et al. (2018) Mother-child role confusion, child adjustment problems, and the moderating roles of child temperament and sex. Dev Psychol 54:1891-1903
McKinnon, Rachel D; Blair, Clancy; Family Life Project Investigators (2018) Does early executive function predict teacher-child relationships from kindergarten to second grade? Dev Psychol 54:2053-2066
Perry, Rosemarie E; Finegood, Eric D; Braren, Stephen H et al. (2018) Developing a neurobehavioral animal model of poverty: Drawing cross-species connections between environments of scarcity-adversity, parenting quality, and infant outcome. Dev Psychopathol :1-20
Gueron-Sela, Noa; Camerota, Marie; Willoughby, Michael T et al. (2018) Maternal depressive symptoms, mother-child interactions, and children's executive function. Dev Psychol 54:71-82
Blair, Clancy; Berry, Daniel J; FLP Investigators (2017) Moderate within-person variability in cortisol is related to executive function in early childhood. Psychoneuroendocrinology 81:88-95
Willoughby, Michael T; Gottfredson, Nisha C; Stifter, Cynthia A et al. (2017) Observed temperament from ages 6 to 36 months predicts parent- and teacher-reported attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in first grade. Dev Psychopathol 29:107-120
Ribner, Andrew D; Willoughby, Michael T; Blair, Clancy B et al. (2017) Executive Function Buffers the Association between Early Math and Later Academic Skills. Front Psychol 8:869
Zvara, B J; Mills-Koonce, R; Cox, M (2017) Maternal Childhood Sexual Trauma, Child Directed Aggression, Parenting Behavior, and the Moderating Role of Child Sex. J Fam Violence 32:219-229

Showing the most recent 10 out of 117 publications