The overall charge to this Core is to tackle the """"""""work of specification"""""""" at the level of research practice needed to apply CF to recovery in social contexts. In the opening year we undertake the foundational work needed before measures and study designs can be developed for CF-informed research, and provide oversight and consultation for active and proposed projects. The MC will work in concert with the Capabilities Seminar (OC) and investigators in PRC to translate CF into a conceptual model suitable for MHSR. Specifying the model for psychiatric disabilities provides the groundwork to develop next stage methods and metrics. It will also enable us to import social science theory to further develop the descriptive and assessment tools needed to appraise capabilities, choice and environments that foster them in a mental health context. Year 1 projects apply economics and social/community psychology theories to CF.
The aims of the Methods Core are to: 1. Specify and operationalize key constructs and propositions in CF as applied to psychiatric disability; 2. Use social science theory to translate elements of CF for this purpose - first, Grossman's Health Capital Model from economics and environmental assessment from social and community psychology; 3. Ensure the scientific rigor of Center projects by assessing research designs, reviewing ongoing projects, and providing consultation on design and analyses to Center affiliates and the OC;and 4. Evaluate the Center's CBPR process on an ongoing and formal basis. MC activities begin with 3 projects alongside ongoing oversight and consultation to both active pilots and others in development in CS. The lead project specifies CF for psychiatric disability, using mixed methods and the Center's participatory process to develop a rigorous language for capturing the distinctive value added by CF to MHSR, and to consider study designs and measurement options appropriate to the framing constraints of capabilities. A second project constructs a template for applying social science theory to CF in a participatory context, applying Becker's human capital approach to the demand for (mental) health. A third project uses theory in community psychology to explore characteristics of environments that foster two fundamental capabilities (self-determination and affiliation) for people with severe mental illness;this pilot explicitly addresses tradeoffs, an underdeveloped aspect of CF, and is geared to drafting a full research proposal to develop the environmental metrics. In out years, as expertise and empirical database allow, we will build on the initial conceptual work to design studies, develop measures and apply social science theory to CF. Prospects include sociological theory on status reduction and stigma, which captures the moral dimension of capability deprivation [100;141];or using political theory to operationalize """"""""recognition"""""""" - a vital element in the identity politics that have taken shape in the consumer/survivor wing of the recovery movement [232].

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Exploratory Grants (P20)
Project #
5P20MH078188-04
Application #
8143309
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZMH1)
Project Start
2010-08-01
Project End
2012-07-31
Budget Start
2010-08-01
Budget End
2011-07-31
Support Year
4
Fiscal Year
2010
Total Cost
$114,526
Indirect Cost
Name
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Department
Type
DUNS #
167204762
City
Orangeburg
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10962
Gonzales, Lauren; Chan, Ginny; Yanos, Philip T (2017) Individual and Neighborhood Predictors of Mental Illness Stigma in New York State. Stigma Health 2:175-181
Myers, Neely Anne Laurenzo; Ziv, Tali (2016) ""No One Ever Even Asked Me that Before"": Autobiographical Power, Social Defeat, and Recovery among African Americans with Lived Experiences of Psychosis. Med Anthropol Q 30:395-413
Myers, Neely Anne Laurenzo (2016) Recovery stories: An anthropological exploration of moral agency in stories of mental health recovery. Transcult Psychiatry 53:427-44
Shinn, Marybeth (2015) Community psychology and the capabilities approach. Am J Community Psychol 55:243-52
Barrow, Susan M; Alexander, Mary Jane; McKinney, Jacki et al. (2014) Context and opportunity: multiple perspectives on parenting by women with a severe mental illness. Psychiatr Rehabil J 37:176-82
Austin, Elizabeth; Ramakrishnan, Aditi; Hopper, Kim (2014) Embodying recovery: a qualitative study of peer work in a consumer-run service setting. Community Ment Health J 50:879-85
Bergstresser, Sara M; Brown, Isaac S; Colesante, Amy (2013) Political engagement as an element of social recovery: a qualitative study. Psychiatr Serv 64:819-21
Henwood, Benjamin F; Stanhope, Victoria; Brawer, Rickie et al. (2013) Addressing chronic disease within supportive housing programs. Prog Community Health Partnersh 7:67-75
Pratt, Christina; Yanos, Philip T; Kopelovich, Sarah L et al. (2013) Predictors of Criminal Justice Outcomes Among Mental Health Courts Participants: The Role of Perceived Coercion and Subjective Mental Health Recovery. Int J Forensic Ment Health 12:116-125
Kopelovich, Sarah; Yanos, Philip; Pratt, Christina et al. (2013) Procedural justice in mental health courts: judicial practices, participant perceptions, and outcomes related to mental health recovery. Int J Law Psychiatry 36:113-20

Showing the most recent 10 out of 14 publications