The Administrative Core provides overall scientific and administrative supervision and coordination of the ADC. The ADC Director is the Administrative Core Leader. He is assisted by eight Core Leaders and/or Senior Investigators who serve as Associate Administrative Core Leaders, and who together with the Director and ADC Administrator form the Center's Executive Committee. Day-to-day administration and fiscal management is carried out by the Center Administrator and Administrative Assistant. The Executive Committee, with the assistance of the Administrator, implements the policies and pursues goals of the ADC. The Executive Committee interacts directly with the Core Leaders and with the heads of the affiliated research programs and projects. The Director and Executive Committee receive guidance and assistance External Advisory Committee, which meets annually to review progress and scientific productivity and to make recommendations for strengthening the Center. Pilot Study proposals are reviewed each year by a Pilot Study Review Committee and are approved by the Executive Committee. During the past 5-years, the Administrative Core has continued to improve the well-established administrative structure and procedures necessary to achieve its goals. The procedures and administrative functions of the core have evolved with the continuing growth and success of the ADC. Regular ADC meetings provide a forum for establishing and implementing ADC policies, monitoring progress of the Cores, reviewing and disseminating recent research, and stimulating new research and research collaborations. There has been substantial growth in the productivity of the ADC, as evidenced by increases in the number of grants and projects using ADC resources, the extent of utilization of subjects, data and biological samples, and the number of publications associated with the ADC. There has also been increased collaboration with national consortia and outside investigators. Successful initiatives during the current grant period have included strengthening the productivity of the pilot study program, contributing to the establishment of the new Center of Excellence (CoE) on Brain Aging, and with the CoE, enhancing core resources to include Biorepository and Clinical Trials Cores. These developments serve to strengthen the ADC's scientific focus on early diagnosis and prevention of AD.

Public Health Relevance

The Administrative Core is essential for the sucessful operation and coordination of the ADC. Thus the Administrafice Core enables the ADC to achieve its scientific and public health goal- the early diagnosis and prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
5P30AG008051-22
Application #
8467977
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZAG1-ZIJ-4)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2011-07-01
Budget End
2012-04-30
Support Year
22
Fiscal Year
2011
Total Cost
$324,690
Indirect Cost
Name
New York University
Department
Type
DUNS #
121911077
City
New York
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10016
Zhou, Hao Henry; Singh, Vikas; Johnson, Sterling C et al. (2018) Statistical tests and identifiability conditions for pooling and analyzing multisite datasets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:1481-1486
Sharma, Ram A; Varga, Andrew W; Bubu, Omonigho M et al. (2018) Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity Affects Amyloid Burden in Cognitively Normal Elderly. A Longitudinal Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 197:933-943
Kaur, Antarpreet; Edland, Steven D; Peavy, Guerry M (2018) The MoCA-Memory Index Score: An Efficient Alternative to Paragraph Recall for the Detection of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 32:120-124
Tolea, Magdalena I; Chrisphonte, Stephanie; Galvin, James E (2018) Sarcopenic obesity and cognitive performance. Clin Interv Aging 13:1111-1119
Brenowitz, Willa D; Han, Fang; Kukull, Walter A et al. (2018) Treated hypothyroidism is associated with cerebrovascular disease but not Alzheimer's disease pathology in older adults. Neurobiol Aging 62:64-71
Davis, Jeremy J (2018) Performance validity in older adults: Observed versus predicted false positive rates in relation to number of tests administered. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 40:1013-1021
Kochunov, Peter; Dickie, Erin W; Viviano, Joseph D et al. (2018) Integration of routine QA data into mega-analysis may improve quality and sensitivity of multisite diffusion tensor imaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 39:1015-1023
Lin, Ming; Gong, Pinghua; Yang, Tao et al. (2018) Big Data Analytical Approaches to the NACC Dataset: Aiding Preclinical Trial Enrichment. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 32:18-27
Gallagher, Damien; Kiss, Alex; Lanctot, Krista L et al. (2018) Toward Prevention of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults With Depression: An Observational Study of Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors. J Clin Psychiatry 80:
Kirson, Noam Y; Scott Andrews, J; Desai, Urvi et al. (2018) Patient Characteristics and Outcomes Associated with Receiving an Earlier Versus Later Diagnosis of Probable Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 61:295-307

Showing the most recent 10 out of 604 publications