PROGRAM PLANNING AND EVALUATION The Cancer Center has benefited from broad participation of the membership in its planning and implementation process. In addition, it has taken advantage of formal and ad hoc consultations that have had a major impact on program development. The leadership intends to continue to receive outside consultation, as well as advice from within the institution as it goes forward. External Scientific Advisory Board The development of the Cancer Center has been to a large extent guided by the advice of the External Scientific Advisory Board, which has convened on two occasions (March, 2004 and May, 2005) on the Stanford campus to comment on progress in the recruitment of the senior leadership and to evaluate the research programs and shared resources. This Board is constituted of highly experienced scientists, administrators and leaders from the cancer research community, all of whom have considerable expertise in the planning and evaluation of NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Their input has been invaluable and has continued to the time of submission of this proposal with consultations through telephone and e-mail. This Board will provide an ongoing source of consultation to the leadership as it evaluates its current activities and develops new initiatives.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
5P30CA124435-02
Application #
7623550
Study Section
Subcommittee G - Education (NCI)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2008-06-01
Budget End
2009-05-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2008
Total Cost
$142,562
Indirect Cost
Name
Stanford University
Department
Type
DUNS #
009214214
City
Stanford
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
94305
Im, Hogune; Rao, Varsha; Sridhar, Kunju et al. (2018) Distinct transcriptomic and exomic abnormalities within myelodysplastic syndrome marrow cells. Leuk Lymphoma 59:2952-2962
Huang, Min; Zhu, Li; Garcia, Jacqueline S et al. (2018) Brd4 regulates the expression of essential autophagy genes and Keap1 in AML cells. Oncotarget 9:11665-11676
Chiou, Shin-Heng; Dorsch, Madeleine; Kusch, Eva et al. (2018) Hmga2 is dispensable for pancreatic cancer development, metastasis, and therapy resistance. Sci Rep 8:14008
Breslow, David K; Hoogendoorn, Sascha; Kopp, Adam R et al. (2018) A CRISPR-based screen for Hedgehog signaling provides insights into ciliary function and ciliopathies. Nat Genet 50:460-471
Chu, Lisa W; Till, Cathee; Yang, Baiyu et al. (2018) Circadian genes and risk of prostate cancer in the prostate cancer prevention trial. Mol Carcinog 57:462-466
Patel, Manali I; Sundaram, Vandana; Desai, Manisha et al. (2018) Effect of a Lay Health Worker Intervention on Goals-of-Care Documentation and on Health Care Use, Costs, and Satisfaction Among Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 4:1359-1366
Trieu, Vanessa; Pinto, Harlan; Riess, Jonathan W et al. (2018) Weekly Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Cetuximab in Palliative Treatment of Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Oncologist 23:764-e86
Kuonen, François; Surbeck, Isabelle; Sarin, Kavita Y et al. (2018) TGF?, Fibronectin and Integrin ?5?1 Promote Invasion in Basal Cell Carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol 138:2432-2442
Gee, Marvin H; Han, Arnold; Lofgren, Shane M et al. (2018) Antigen Identification for Orphan T Cell Receptors Expressed on Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes. Cell 172:549-563.e16
Malta, Tathiane M; Sokolov, Artem; Gentles, Andrew J et al. (2018) Machine Learning Identifies Stemness Features Associated with Oncogenic Dedifferentiation. Cell 173:338-354.e15

Showing the most recent 10 out of 322 publications