Tobacco use is responsible for 35 percent of cancer deaths, including cancers of the lung, oral cavity, larynx, esophagus, bladder, stomach, pancreas, kidney, uterus, cervix, and liver, as well as heart and other diseases. The tobacco industry develops and implements specific strategies to promote adoption, continuation, and public tolerance of smoking and to counter efforts by public health professionals to reduce tobacco use. In this way, it serves as a """"""""vector"""""""" for the spread of tobacco-induced disease. As with any disease, it is important to understand the vector to develop and implement effective prevention and control strategies. Understanding the tobacco industry's strategies and tactics will increase the likelihood of successful development and implementation of effective tobacco use prevention and control policies and, hence, reduce tobacco-induced disease and death. Public policies, including smoke free environments, aggressive media campaigns, and tax increases, are cost-effective interventions to prevent and reduce tobacco use. There have been major changes in the environment for tobacco control policy making and program implementation in recent years: during the 1990s, state initiatives and settlements of major litigation against the tobacco industry yielded substantial resources for tobacco control programs, which was associated with significant drops in smoking and smoking-induced disease. Despite these successes, during the past few years there has been a reduction in public attention and funding for tobacco control. This project seeks to continue our research strategy of combining case studies and quantitative methods to address four specific aims in this rapidly changing environment: (1) Document and analyze variations in tobacco control policy making and program implementation across a variety of states with varying levels of success at developing and implementing tobacco control programs, to serve as the basis for recommendations to create the most effective and efficient tobacco control strategies and policies;(2) Identify and describe new and evolving tobacco industry strategies for using third party allies to oppose or weaken tobacco control policies;(3) Continue our comparative analysis of the effectiveness of tobacco control strategies in different legal and financial contexts, to identify the most cost-effective strategies;and (4) Investigate the effects of smoke free policies on bar and casino businesses.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01CA061021-16
Application #
7666210
Study Section
Community Influences on Health Behavior (CIHB)
Program Officer
Bloch, Michele H
Project Start
1994-07-01
Project End
2011-07-31
Budget Start
2009-08-01
Budget End
2010-07-31
Support Year
16
Fiscal Year
2009
Total Cost
$388,337
Indirect Cost
Name
University of California San Francisco
Department
Social Sciences
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
094878337
City
San Francisco
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
94143
Lempert, Lauren K; Glantz, Stanton A (2018) Tobacco Industry Promotional Strategies Targeting American Indians/Alaska Natives and Exploiting Tribal Sovereignty. Nicotine Tob Res :
Jiang, Nan; Gonzalez, Mariaelena; Ling, Pamela M et al. (2017) Smoke-Free Laws and Hazardous Drinking: A Cross-Sectional Study among U.S. Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:
Dutra, Lauren M; Glantz, Stanton A (2017) E-cigarettes and National Adolescent Cigarette Use: 2004-2014. Pediatrics 139:
Cheng, Kai-Wen; Liu, Feng; Gonzalez, MariaElena et al. (2017) The Effects of Workplace Clean Indoor Air Law Coverage on Workers' Smoking-Related Outcomes. Health Econ 26:226-242
Dutra, Lauren; Glantz, Stanton (2017) We Agree on the Importance of Contextual and Temporal Accuracy When Studying Novel Tobacco Products. Pediatrics 139:
Fallin-Bennett, Amanda; Roditis, Maria; Glantz, Stanton A (2017) The carrot and the stick? Strategies to improve compliance with college campus tobacco policies. J Am Coll Health 65:122-130
Dutra, Lauren M; Glantz, Stanton A; Lisha, Nadra E et al. (2017) Beyond experimentation: Five trajectories of cigarette smoking in a longitudinal sample of youth. PLoS One 12:e0171808
Apollonio, Dorie E; Glantz, Stanton A (2016) Minimum Ages of Legal Access for Tobacco in the United States From 1863 to 2015. Am J Public Health 106:1200-7
Popova, Lucy; Linde, Brittany D; Bursac, Zoran et al. (2016) Testing antismoking messages for Air Force trainees. Tob Control 25:656-663
Lightwood, James; Glantz, Stanton A (2016) Smoking Behavior and Healthcare Expenditure in the United States, 1992-2009: Panel Data Estimates. PLoS Med 13:e1002020

Showing the most recent 10 out of 146 publications