The long term objective of the proposed research is to understand how cochlear implant patients recognize speech when presented by a few channels of stimulation. To achieve this objective we propose converging experiments with normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant patients. Our experiments fall into three, broad categories. In the first category are four experiments in which the aim is to compare the performance of normally hearing subjects listening to speech processed in the manner of an implant processor with the performance of implant patients. Our goal is to assess the reality of implant performance in quiet and in noise against the potential level of performance which might be achieved with implant systems. In the second category of experiments our aim, in seven experiments, is to assess the effects of selected signal-processor and electrode parameters on speech understanding. Our goal is to uncover processor parameters which will enhance speech understanding. We will assess speech understanding under conditions in which the signal processing differs, e.g., fixed channel processors vs. n-of-m (SPEAK-like) processors, and CIS vs.SAS processors; conditions in which the spacing and apical extent of electrodes differ; and conditions in which the algorithms which map input signals on the compression function differ. In the third category of experiments is a single experiment in which we model the use of channel amplitudes by implant patients for vowel recognition. Overall, our experiments are designed, first, to assess how well implants function relative to how well they could function; second, to determine processor variables which could enhance patient performance; and, third, to provide a deeper understanding of how patients use the information delivered by a signal processor to recognize the sounds of speech.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01DC000654-10
Application #
6379282
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-CMS (02))
Program Officer
Donahue, Amy
Project Start
1989-12-01
Project End
2004-03-31
Budget Start
2001-04-01
Budget End
2002-03-31
Support Year
10
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
$180,989
Indirect Cost
Name
Arizona State University-Tempe Campus
Department
Other Health Professions
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
188435911
City
Tempe
State
AZ
Country
United States
Zip Code
85287
Dorman, Michael F; Loiselle, Louise; Stohl, Josh et al. (2014) Interaural level differences and sound source localization for bilateral cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 35:633-40
Spahr, Anthony J; Dorman, Michael F; Litvak, Leonid M et al. (2012) Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear 33:112-7
Gifford, Rene H; Dorman, Michael F (2012) THE PSYCHOPHYSICS OF LOW-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC HEARING IN ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION (EAS) AND BIMODAL PATIENTS. J Hear Sci 2:33-44
Gifford, René H; Dorman, Michael F; Brown, Chris et al. (2012) HEARING, PSYCHOPHYSICS, AND COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION: EXPERIENCES OF OLDER INDIVIDUALS WITH MILD SLOPING TO PROFOUND SENSORY HEARING LOSS. J Hear Sci 2:9-17
Gifford, René H; Dorman, Michael F; Shallop, Jon K et al. (2010) Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear Hear 31:186-94
Gifford, Rene H; Dorman, Michael F; Brown, Christopher A (2010) Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 67:51-60
Gilley, Phillip M; Sharma, Anu; Mitchell, Teresa V et al. (2010) The influence of a sensitive period for auditory-visual integration in children with cochlear implants. Restor Neurol Neurosci 28:207-18
Dorman, Michael F; Gifford, Rene H (2010) Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition. Int J Audiol 49:912-9
Zhang, Ting; Dorman, Michael F; Spahr, Anthony J (2010) Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation. Ear Hear 31:63-9
Zhang, Ting; Spahr, Anthony J; Dorman, Michael F (2010) Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Ear Hear 31:195-201

Showing the most recent 10 out of 46 publications