Cortical areas are generally assumed to be uniform in internal structure, with each area homogeneously repeating a common processing module across its microcolumns. However, various lines of evidence indicate significant heterogeneities within individual areas of sensory cortex. Within primary visual cortex (V1), for example, the horizontal dimension of cortex is tiled with ocular dominance columns, orientation columns, and columns related to other stimulus attributes such as direction selectivity and spatial frequency. How the specific structure of any of these columns influences visual information processing is unknown. We propose to examine the effect of one set of columns -- orientation columns -- on cortical responses within V1. Our hypothesis is that the particular structure of the orientation map, comprised of pinwheel centers and orientation domains, regulates key features of neuron responses, of plasticity in these responses, and of vision. Specific questions are as follows: 1. Do neurons in iso-orientation domains and pinwheel centers of the orientation map in V1 integrate cortical inputs differently? 2. Does orientation selectivity of single neurons evolve with different time courses and dynamics at different locations within the orientation map? 3. Does the correlated firing of neuron pairs vary at different locations in the cortex? 4. Does short-term plasticity of orientation tuning, as revealed by briefly adapting V1 neurons to a particular stimulus orientation (""""""""temporal context""""""""), depend on cortical location? Does the degree of orientation plasticity relate to the size of orientation domains in which neurons are located? 5. What is the relationship between multiple V1 columnar systems such as those for space, orientation, direction, spatial frequency and ocular dominance? In particular, how does the proximity to pinwheel centers and iso-orientation domains influence the mapping of visual space? 6. Are long-range inputs that convey surround responses (""""""""spatial context"""""""") to neurons from outside their classical receptive field integrated differently at different locations in cortex? 7. Does V1 in alert monkeys show differences between pinwheel centers and iso-orientation domains with respect to: (a) the dynamics of orientation tuning at different map locations, (b) the effects of short-term pattern adaptation on orientation selectivity and dynamics, and (c) the effect of long-range inputs on response magnitude, selectivity and time course. 8. What is the effect of spatial attention on orientation-specific responses in alert monkey V1? 9. Does a related top-down influence, reward expectancy, modulate orientation-specific responses in alert monkey V1? Are these effects more pronounced at pinwheel centers, which integrate inputs broadly and might be particularly sensitive to signals that modulate response levels or gain? These experiments will utilize multiple approaches, including optical imaging of intrinsic signals, intracellular recording in vivo and extracellular unit recording with single and multiple electrodes to analyze how particular locations of V1 integrate local, long-range and descending inputs in space and time and hence provide the substrate for vision. The results would provide information that is fundamental for understanding cortical networks and function, and for treating malfunction and disease.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
2R01EY007023-16
Application #
6473355
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-SSS-E (10))
Program Officer
Oberdorfer, Michael
Project Start
1986-09-01
Project End
2007-03-31
Budget Start
2002-04-01
Budget End
2003-03-31
Support Year
16
Fiscal Year
2002
Total Cost
$410,868
Indirect Cost
Name
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Department
Miscellaneous
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
City
Cambridge
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02139
Ip, Jacque P K; Nagakura, Ikue; Petravicz, Jeremy et al. (2018) Major Vault Protein, a Candidate Gene in 16p11.2 Microdeletion Syndrome, Is Required for the Homeostatic Regulation of Visual Cortical Plasticity. J Neurosci 38:3890-3900
Huda, Rafiq; Goard, Michael J; Pho, Gerald N et al. (2018) Neural mechanisms of sensorimotor transformation and action selection. Eur J Neurosci :
Bloem, Bernard; Huda, Rafiq; Sur, Mriganka et al. (2017) Two-photon imaging in mice shows striosomes and matrix have overlapping but differential reinforcement-related responses. Elife 6:
Sugihara, Hiroki; Chen, Naiyan; Sur, Mriganka (2016) Cell-specific modulation of plasticity and cortical state by cholinergic inputs to the visual cortex. J Physiol Paris 110:37-43
Chen, Naiyan; Sugihara, Hiroki; Kim, Jinah et al. (2016) Direct modulation of GFAP-expressing glia in the arcuate nucleus bi-directionally regulates feeding. Elife 5:
Banerjee, Abhishek; Rikhye, Rajeev V; Breton-Provencher, Vincent et al. (2016) Jointly reduced inhibition and excitation underlies circuit-wide changes in cortical processing in Rett syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E7287-E7296
Goard, Michael J; Pho, Gerald N; Woodson, Jonathan et al. (2016) Distinct roles of visual, parietal, and frontal motor cortices in memory-guided sensorimotor decisions. Elife 5:
Chen, Naiyan; Sugihara, Hiroki; Sur, Mriganka (2015) An acetylcholine-activated microcircuit drives temporal dynamics of cortical activity. Nat Neurosci 18:892-902
Rikhye, Rajeev V; Sur, Mriganka (2015) Spatial Correlations in Natural Scenes Modulate Response Reliability in Mouse Visual Cortex. J Neurosci 35:14661-80
Swiech, Lukasz; Heidenreich, Matthias; Banerjee, Abhishek et al. (2015) In vivo interrogation of gene function in the mammalian brain using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol 33:102-6

Showing the most recent 10 out of 27 publications