TGFp isoforms ((31, (32, and p3) are 25 kDa disulfide-linked homodimers that regulate cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and expression of extracellular matrix proteins. TGFps are best known for their tumor suppressor activity, and while loss of this activity leads to certain hereditary forms of colon and pancreatic cancer, in most cancers, including those of.the breast, the TGFp signaling pathway remains intact. This usually has adverse effects since the tumor promoting activities of TGFp, including its ability to stimulate immune suppression and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transitions, remain intact, yet its growth inhibitory activity is lost, due to either inactivation of the retinoblastoma gene product (pRB) or expression of growth stimulatory genes, such as c-myc. The three isoforms of TGFp share 71 - 79 % sequence identity and signal through a pair of structurally similar single-pass transmembrane receptors known as TRI and TRII. The isoforms nevertheless fufill distinct roles in vivo as shown by the non-overlapping and lethal phenotypes of the isoform specific -/- null mice, by differences in response induced by the addition of purified isoforms in tissue explant assays, and by the opposing roles they play in diseases, such as breast cancer. The origins of these differences are not understood, although based on previous cell-based crosslinking and structural studies, it might be due to differences in the manner by which they bind and assemble their receptors into a signaling complex. The first major objective of this proposal is to define the molecular architecture of the extracellular component of the TRI:TRII:TGFp signaling complex. This will provide fundamental information concerning the interdependent nature of TGFp receptor assembly, as well as how assembly differs for the isoforms whose monomers are fixed relative to one another (TGFps 1 and 2) compared to those whose monomers are not fixed (TGFpS). The second major component of this project concerns TGFp2, which also signals by binding and bringing together TRI and TRII, but which binds TRII weakly, and which is dependent upon a third cell surface TGFp binding protein, known as betaglycan, to induce its cellular responses. The objective of the proposed studies is to determine the structural basis underlying the mechanism by which the endoglin-like domain of the TGFp co-receptor betaglycan facilitates binding of TGFp2 to TRII. This will provide the first example of how one of the co-receptors in the family functions to selectively enhance the sensitivity of cells to a particular ligand isoform. The information derived from these studies will then be used to generate mutant TGFps to test whether differences among the isoforms in their manner of receptor binding indeed underlie their differences in biological activity using two different cell-based systems.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01GM058670-09
Application #
7682889
Study Section
Macromolecular Structure and Function B Study Section (MSFB)
Program Officer
Smith, Ward
Project Start
1999-09-01
Project End
2011-08-31
Budget Start
2009-09-01
Budget End
2011-08-31
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
2009
Total Cost
$301,930
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
Department
Biochemistry
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
800772162
City
San Antonio
State
TX
Country
United States
Zip Code
78229
Zhu, Haiyan; Gu, Xiang; Xia, Lu et al. (2018) A Novel TGF? Trap Blocks Chemotherapeutics-Induced TGF?1 Signaling and Enhances Their Anticancer Activity in Gynecologic Cancers. Clin Cancer Res 24:2780-2793
Ramachandran, Anassuya; Vizán, Pedro; Das, Debipriya et al. (2018) TGF-? uses a novel mode of receptor activation to phosphorylate SMAD1/5 and induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Elife 7:
Walker, Ryan G; Czepnik, Magdalena; Goebel, Erich J et al. (2017) Structural basis for potency differences between GDF8 and GDF11. BMC Biol 15:19
de la Cruz, M Jason; Hattne, Johan; Shi, Dan et al. (2017) Atomic-resolution structures from fragmented protein crystals with the cryoEM method MicroED. Nat Methods 14:399-402
Kim, Sun Kyung; Barron, Lindsey; Hinck, Cynthia S et al. (2017) An engineered transforming growth factor ? (TGF-?) monomer that functions as a dominant negative to block TGF-? signaling. J Biol Chem 292:7173-7188
Johnston, Chris J C; Smyth, Danielle J; Kodali, Ravindra B et al. (2017) A structurally distinct TGF-? mimic from an intestinal helminth parasite potently induces regulatory T cells. Nat Commun 8:1741
Roman, Beth L; Hinck, Andrew P (2017) ALK1 signaling in development and disease: new paradigms. Cell Mol Life Sci 74:4539-4560
Hinck, Andrew P; Mueller, Thomas D; Springer, Timothy A (2016) Structural Biology and Evolution of the TGF-? Family. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 8:
Villarreal, Maria M; Kim, Sun Kyung; Barron, Lindsey et al. (2016) Binding Properties of the Transforming Growth Factor-? Coreceptor Betaglycan: Proposed Mechanism for Potentiation of Receptor Complex Assembly and Signaling. Biochemistry 55:6880-6896
Huang, Tao; Hinck, Andrew P (2016) Production, Isolation, and Structural Analysis of Ligands and Receptors of the TGF-? Superfamily. Methods Mol Biol 1344:63-92

Showing the most recent 10 out of 32 publications