This is a revision of a competing renewal application which was approved but not funded. In this revision we have made every effort to respond to the critiques of the prior review. Behavioral economics, the application of microeconomic principles to the study of behavior, has value for the field of drug dependence. The value stems from (1) its ability to integrate the effects of independent variables into a singular term, referred to as unit price, and (2) its ability to specify conditions under which choice of a drug vs. a non-drug reinforcer varies from being probable to improbable. The former suggests the parsimony of this approach; the latter suggests its utility in accounting for the selection of drug vs. other reinforcers. The purpose of this proposal is two-fold. The first purpose is to continue our basic research on unit price. We will examine whether several important operations that have yet to be incorporated into unit price (e.g., punishment, reinforcer delay, & probability of reinforcement) can be parsimoniously integrated. These experiments will demonstrate the generality and define the limitations of unit-price. The second purpose is to examine the utility of behavioral economics in the evaluation of medications for the treatment of drug dependence. We will examine the effect of agonist and antagonist treatment on the economic measure of elasticity (the responsiveness of drug consumption to unit price). This new measure, elasticity, may provide an index of whether a medication renders drug use more sensitive to cost factors in the environment. Further, we will examine whether the behavioral- economic determinants of drug choice can assist in assessing the effectiveness of medications under different environmental conditions and whether those determinants can be used to develop a laboratory analog of conditions that promote patient entry into treatment. These experiments will put what we have learned about behavioral economics into the service of assessing medications for the treatment of drug dependence. Moreover, the behavioral-economic determinants of drug choice will allow us to assess and characterize medications under conditions that may more closely approximate clinical conditions than do current assessment models. Finally, developing an assay to assess factors that determine entry into treatment may be useful for any form of treatment. Overall, the continued assessment of the basic factors related to the behavioral economics of drug self-administration and the application of those factors to address medication development provide an important opportunity to explore and utilize this new approach.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Method to Extend Research in Time (MERIT) Award (R37)
Project #
2R37DA006526-08
Application #
2726250
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZDA1-KXA-N (17))
Program Officer
Shurtleff, David
Project Start
1990-06-01
Project End
2002-11-30
Budget Start
1998-01-20
Budget End
1998-11-30
Support Year
8
Fiscal Year
1998
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Vermont & St Agric College
Department
Psychiatry
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
066811191
City
Burlington
State
VT
Country
United States
Zip Code
05405
Wilson, A George; Franck, Christopher T; Mueller, E Terry et al. (2015) Predictors of delay discounting among smokers: education level and a Utility Measure of Cigarette Reinforcement Efficacy are better predictors than demographics, smoking characteristics, executive functioning, impulsivity, or time perception. Addict Behav 45:124-33
Comer, Sandra D; Bickel, Warren K; Yi, Richard et al. (2010) Human behavioral pharmacology, past, present, and future: symposium presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Behavioral Pharmacology Society. Behav Pharmacol 21:251-77
Bickel, Warren K; Yi, Richard; Mueller, E Terry et al. (2010) The behavioral economics of drug dependence: towards the consilience of economics and behavioral neuroscience. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 3:319-41
Mueller, Eldon T; Landes, Reid D; Kowal, Benjamin P et al. (2009) Delay of smoking gratification as a laboratory model of relapse: effects of incentives for not smoking, and relationship with measures of executive function. Behav Pharmacol 20:461-73
Bickel, Warren K; Mueller, E Terry (2009) Toward the Study of Trans-Disease Processes: A Novel Approach With Special Reference to the Study of Co-morbidity. J Dual Diagn 5:131-138
Bickel, Warren K; Yi, Richard (2008) Temporal discounting as a measure of executive function: insights from the competing neuro-behavioral decision system hypothesis of addiction. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res 20:289-309
Kowal, Benjamin P; Bickel, Warren K; Landes, Reid D (2008) Temporal horizons of cigarette satiety: determining the window of time over which recent smoking influences motivation to smoke. Behav Pharmacol 19:339-46
Bickel, Warren K; Miller, Michelle L; Yi, Richard et al. (2007) Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes. Drug Alcohol Depend 90 Suppl 1:S85-91
Badger, Gary J; Bickel, Warren K; Giordano, Louis A et al. (2007) Altered states: the impact of immediate craving on the valuation of current and future opioids. J Health Econ 26:865-76
Kirshenbaum, Ari P; Bickel, Warren K; Boynton, David M (2006) Simulated opioid withdrawal engenders risk-prone choice: a comparison of intravenous and intranasal-using populations. Drug Alcohol Depend 83:130-6

Showing the most recent 10 out of 35 publications