The general goal is to continue our successful cooperative efforts to develop new instruments and assessment methods for evaluating clinical effectiveness in AD clinical trials. This work is accomplished by capitalizing on the unique collective expertise, experience, and patient resource of the ADCS through subcommittees of ADCS experts that develop new or improved measures and evaluation methods and facilitate the use of these methods in ADCS clinical trials. The ADCS Instrument Committee (consisting of the Project Director, the chair of each subcommittee and the ADCS Statistician) will continue to be responsible for coordinating and integrating the work of the subcommittees, for evaluating the utility of new measures by incorporating them into multi- site clinical trials, and for working closely with ADCS investigators in selecting outcome measures for ADCS clinical trials. Improved evaluation of treatment efficacy is necessary to optimize determination of whether a drug has a therapeutic effect, whether the effect observed is clinically meaningful and of sufficient magnitude to outweigh possible risks, and ultimately, whether the treatment has a favorable socioeconomic impact. Over the past 10 years, the ADCS Instrument the ADCS Instrument Committee has helped to define the state of the art in assessment for AD and MCI clinical trials. However, further work is now needed to improve the efficiency and reduce the cost of measures used in AD primary prevention trials. Since there are now promising treatments that may slow the disease progression or prevent AD, the current project will focus on developing sensitive and more efficient and more efficient methods for evaluating change in normal elderly subjects.
The specific aims of the Prevention Instrument Protocol are: (1) to assess the reliability, efficiency, validity and sensitivity to longitudinal change and early AD or new instruments in each of five domains. These instruments are mostly self-administered and designed for use in AD prevention. 650 non-demented elderly subjects participating in the ADCS Primary Prevention Trial will also participate in this Prevention Instrument Protocol. The 5 domains are global change, cognition, activities of daily living, quality of life and pharmacoeconomics; (2) to evaluate and compare two self-assessment methods of data acquisition: (a) In-clinic, and (2) at-home, by mail, with assistance via telephone. 699 subjects will be randomized to complete the instruments annually, 300 at their clinic visits for the Primary Prevention Trial and 300 at home, and (3) to conduct a pilot evaluation of the feasibility and unity of web-based data acquisition of the new assessments. 50 additional subjects who have access to a computer and the Internet will participate in this pilot study.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Research Project--Cooperative Agreements (U01)
Project #
2U01AG010483-11
Application #
6370753
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZAG1)
Project Start
1991-09-30
Project End
2006-06-30
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
11
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
New York University
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
New York
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10016
Rockenstein, Edward; Ostroff, Gary; Dikengil, Fusun et al. (2018) Combined Active Humoral and Cellular Immunization Approaches for the Treatment of Synucleinopathies. J Neurosci 38:1000-1014
Edmonds, Emily C; Ard, M Colin; Edland, Steven D et al. (2018) Unmasking the benefits of donepezil via psychometrically precise identification of mild cognitive impairment: A secondary analysis of the ADCS vitamin E and donepezil in MCI study. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 4:11-18
Chen, Yun-Fei; Ni, Xiao; Fleisher, Adam S et al. (2018) A simulation study comparing slope model with mixed-model repeated measure to assess cognitive data in clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 4:46-53
Jacobs, Diane M; Ard, M Colin; Salmon, David P et al. (2017) Potential implications of practice effects in Alzheimer's disease prevention trials. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 3:531-535
Moussa, Charbel; Hebron, Michaeline; Huang, Xu et al. (2017) Resveratrol regulates neuro-inflammation and induces adaptive immunity in Alzheimer's disease. J Neuroinflammation 14:1
Sims, Rebecca (see original citation for additional authors) (2017) Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet 49:1373-1384
El-Agnaf, Omar; Overk, Cassia; Rockenstein, Edward et al. (2017) Differential effects of immunotherapy with antibodies targeting ?-synuclein oligomers and fibrils in a transgenic model of synucleinopathy. Neurobiol Dis 104:85-96
Jun, Gyungah R; Chung, Jaeyoon; Mez, Jesse et al. (2017) Transethnic genome-wide scan identifies novel Alzheimer's disease loci. Alzheimers Dement 13:727-738
Tarrant, Sarah D; Bardach, Shoshana H; Bates, Kendra et al. (2017) The Effectiveness of Small-group Community-based Information Sessions on Clinical Trial Recruitment for Secondary Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 31:141-145
Kennedy, Richard E; Cutter, Gary R; Wang, Guoqiao et al. (2017) Challenging Assumptions About African American Participation in Alzheimer Disease Trials. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 25:1150-1159

Showing the most recent 10 out of 294 publications