Increased availability and consumption of ultra-processed foods have been associated with rising obesity prevalence, but past studies have not demonstrated whether ultra-processed food causes obesity or adverse health outcomes. We recently completed a clinical trial to investigate whether people ate more calories when exposed to a diet composed of ultra-processed foods compared with a diet composed of unprocessed foods (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03407053). Despite the ultra-processed and unprocessed diets being matched for daily presented calories, sugar, fat, fiber, and macronutrients, we found that people consumed more calories when exposed to the ultra-processed diet as compared to the unprocessed diet. Furthermore, people gained weight on the ultra-processed diet and lost weight on the unprocessed diet. Therefore, our study results suggest that limiting consumption of ultra-processed food may be an effective strategy for obesity prevention and treatment. Competing theories about obesity and its treatment contrast the relative roles of dietary fat versus carbohydrate on promotion of excessive calorie intake. Proponents of low-fat diets argue that diets high in fat promote passive overconsumption due to the high energy density and low satiety index of high-fat foods. Advocates of low-carbohydrate diets propose that diets high in carbohydrates lead to elevated insulin secretion resulting in decreased energy expenditure and increased hunger. We recently tested the effects of a very low carbohydrate, ketogenic diet and found no meaningful effects on energy expenditure, but appetite and ad libitum calorie intake was not assessed. Therefore, we have initiated a feeding study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03878108) in 20 adult men and women to investigate the differences in ad libitum energy intake resulting from consuming two test diets for a pair of 2-week periods in a randomized, crossover design during a single 4-week inpatient period. The test diets presented to participants will be matched for calories and protein, but the low-carbohydrate diet (10% of calories) will be high in fat (75% of calories) whereas the low-fat diet will be high in carbohydrates (75% of calories) and low in fat (10% of calories).

Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
13
Fiscal Year
2019
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
City
State
Country
Zip Code
Hall, Kevin D; Chung, Stephanie T (2018) Low-carbohydrate diets for the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 21:308-312
Hall, Kevin D; Guyenet, Stephan J; Leibel, Rudolph L (2018) The Carbohydrate-Insulin Model of Obesity Is Difficult to Reconcile With Current Evidence. JAMA Intern Med 178:1103-1105
Hall, Kevin D; Guo, Juen (2017) Obesity Energetics: Body Weight Regulation and the Effects of Diet Composition. Gastroenterology 152:1718-1727.e3
Hall, K D (2017) A review of the carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity. Eur J Clin Nutr 71:323-326
Hall, Kevin D; Chen, Kong Y; Guo, Juen et al. (2016) Energy expenditure and body composition changes after an isocaloric ketogenic diet in overweight and obese men. Am J Clin Nutr 104:324-33
Freedhoff, Yoni; Hall, Kevin D (2016) Weight loss diet studies: we need help not hype. Lancet 388:849-51
Hall, Kevin D (2015) Prescribing low-fat diets: useless for long-term weight loss? Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 3:920-1
Hall, Kevin D; Bemis, Thomas; Brychta, Robert et al. (2015) Calorie for Calorie, Dietary Fat Restriction Results in More Body Fat Loss than Carbohydrate Restriction in People with Obesity. Cell Metab 22:427-36
Simmons, W Kyle; Rapuano, Kristina M; Ingeholm, John E et al. (2014) The ventral pallidum and orbitofrontal cortex support food pleasantness inferences. Brain Struct Funct 219:473-83
Schoeller, Dale A; Thomas, Diana; Archer, Edward et al. (2013) Self-report-based estimates of energy intake offer an inadequate basis for scientific conclusions. Am J Clin Nutr 97:1413-5

Showing the most recent 10 out of 11 publications