Injection of supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2) into deep permeable formations of sedimentary basins has been proposed as a viable approach to greenhouse gas sequestration (geostorage). Both aquifer storage efficiency and potential leakage subsequent to injection are critical factors for consideration. Though numerical modeling provides a key assessment tool, multiple sources of uncertainty exist in the model construct, creating significant uncertainty in predicting CO2 flow in the storage formations. For example, one important conceptual model uncertainty is the multiple levels of homogeneity with which a formation can be represented, which are typically constrained by the quality and accessibility of site-specific data. For a given model, some parameters exert more influence on the prediction outcomes than others, thus in site evaluations, the value and relevance of diverse data types need to be better understood. This proposal aims to address this fundamental assessment issue with a two-pronged strategy. First, CO2 flow simulations will be conducted in a novel, experiment-based synthetic aquifer as well as in three increasingly homogenized models (i.e., facies-scale, facies-assemblage-scale, formation scale representations). To assess parameter uncertainties, the simulations will be conducted within an efficient computation framework based on the Design of Experiment. By comparing model predictions (full range of scenarios) and sensitivity (the most significant parameters impacting CO2 flow), an optimal level of model complexity will be determined. The insights gained will then help guide the development of a site-specific model for a CO2 injection test in the Teapot Dome, Wyoming. In modeling the field test, the analysis workflow will be validated in a dynamic setting by integrating simulation with data collection and field observation. Results will clarify the most relevant data types in CO2 modeling that require better characterization. Since successful implementation of carbon geostorage depends on both the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the technical assessment studies, our work will be of broad scientific significance as well as high societal relevance.

Agency
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Institute
Division of Earth Sciences (EAR)
Type
Standard Grant (Standard)
Application #
0838250
Program Officer
H. Richard Lane
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2009-06-15
Budget End
2012-12-31
Support Year
Fiscal Year
2008
Total Cost
$262,416
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Wyoming
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
Laramie
State
WY
Country
United States
Zip Code
82071